PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROKT vs. FSDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROKT vs. FSDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Fidelity Select Defense & Aerospace Portfolio (FSDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROKT achieves a 52.20% return, which is significantly higher than FSDAX's 7.66% return.


ROKT

1D
1.72%
1M
16.83%
YTD
52.20%
6M
68.76%
1Y
122.71%
3Y*
46.59%
5Y*
25.88%
10Y*

FSDAX

1D
-2.01%
1M
6.52%
YTD
7.66%
6M
15.06%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
28.82%
5Y*
16.32%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROKT vs. FSDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
52.20%50.56%27.89%14.41%-0.81%4.63%7.99%40.90%-13.20%
FSDAX
Fidelity Select Defense & Aerospace Portfolio
7.66%50.03%15.83%16.29%6.83%4.91%-7.87%33.75%-12.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ROKT and FSDAX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.84

The correlation between ROKT and FSDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROKT vs. FSDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROKT
ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FSDAX
FSDAX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FSDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FSDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROKT vs. FSDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) and Fidelity Select Defense & Aerospace Portfolio (FSDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROKTFSDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.31

1.38

+2.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.87

2.00

+2.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.24

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.69

1.83

+8.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

39.68

5.37

+34.31

ROKT vs. FSDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROKT Sharpe Ratio is 4.31, which is higher than the FSDAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROKT and FSDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROKTFSDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31

1.38

+2.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.80

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.64

+0.25

Drawdowns

ROKT vs. FSDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROKT drawdown since its inception was -43.16%, smaller than the maximum FSDAX drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROKT and FSDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROKTFSDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.16%

-60.59%

+17.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-16.13%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.46%

-16.13%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

-22.84%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

-6.38%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-10.45%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

5.50%

-2.43%

Volatility

ROKT vs. FSDAX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a higher volatility of 12.31% compared to Fidelity Select Defense & Aerospace Portfolio (FSDAX) at 7.44%. This indicates that ROKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROKTFSDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.31%

7.44%

+4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.76%

18.23%

+6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.61%

21.10%

+7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

20.42%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.11%

22.35%

+2.76%

ROKT vs. FSDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROKT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FSDAX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROKT vs. FSDAX - Dividend Comparison

ROKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than FSDAX's 2.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSDAX
Fidelity Select Defense & Aerospace Portfolio
2.12%4.48%7.68%6.47%8.87%8.38%2.11%2.62%11.45%3.57%4.87%6.30%
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
0.26%0.41%0.57%0.62%0.54%1.79%0.48%0.74%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROKT and FSDAX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROKT has higher volatility (12.31%) compared to FSDAX (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROKT dropped -43.16% vs FSDAX's -60.59%.

ROKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROKT and FSDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer