PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTN vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTN vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTN achieves a 21.64% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 3.00% return.


XTN

1D
-0.75%
1M
12.22%
YTD
21.64%
6M
22.93%
1Y
44.53%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
10.58%

GLDM

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
3.00%
6M
5.60%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTN vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XTN
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
21.64%6.33%4.86%25.22%-28.10%33.68%12.11%21.85%-15.69%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
3.00%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XTN and GLDM is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.02

The correlation between XTN and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XTN vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XTN
GLDM

Industrials

95.4%

-

Technology

4.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

XTN
95.4%
GLDM

-

Technology

XTN
4.6%
GLDM

-

Basic Materials

XTN

-

GLDM
100.0%

Communication Services

XTN

-

GLDM

-

Consumer Cyclical

XTN

-

GLDM

-

Consumer Defensive

XTN

-

GLDM

-

Energy

XTN

-

GLDM

-

Financial Services

XTN

-

GLDM

-

Healthcare

XTN

-

GLDM

-

Real Estate

XTN

-

GLDM

-

Utilities

XTN

-

GLDM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTN vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTN
XTN Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTN Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTN Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTN vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTNGLDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.60

1.24

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

1.63

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.70

+0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.14

4.23

+2.92

XTN vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTN Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTN and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTNGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.24

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

1.04

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.02

-0.57

Drawdowns

XTN vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTN drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTN and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTNGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.77%

-21.63%

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.28%

-19.14%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.69%

-19.14%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-20.92%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.70%

-17.65%

+11.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.94%

-6.22%

-4.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.25%

7.69%

-1.44%

Volatility

XTN vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) has a higher volatility of 7.36% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 5.47%. This indicates that XTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTNGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.36%

5.47%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.05%

22.99%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.03%

26.39%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.83%

17.91%

+8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.19%

16.85%

+9.34%

XTN vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTN vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

XTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTN
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
0.66%0.78%0.93%0.73%1.04%1.02%0.75%1.17%0.98%0.63%0.66%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTN and GLDM have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTN has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to GLDM (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTN dropped -43.77% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 5.36% for XTN. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GLDM has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XTN.

XTN has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

XTN is categorized as Transportation Equities, while GLDM is Gold. XTN tracks S&P Transportation Select Industry Index, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTN and 0.10% for GLDM.

XTN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTN and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer