PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDM vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDM achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.


GLDM

1D
-0.96%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
3.00%
6M
5.60%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
31.49%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
3.00%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDM and SPY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.08

The correlation between GLDM and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GLDM vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLDM
SPY

Basic Materials

100.0%
1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Energy

-

3.6%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Basic Materials

GLDM
100.0%
SPY
1.8%

Communication Services

GLDM

-

SPY
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GLDM

-

SPY
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

GLDM

-

SPY
4.8%

Energy

GLDM

-

SPY
3.6%

Financial Services

GLDM

-

SPY
11.8%

Healthcare

GLDM

-

SPY
8.4%

Industrials

GLDM

-

SPY
7.8%

Real Estate

GLDM

-

SPY
1.9%

Technology

GLDM

-

SPY
35.9%

Utilities

GLDM

-

SPY
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDMSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

3.16

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.23

14.72

-10.49

GLDM vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDM and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDMSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.38

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.82

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.59

+0.43

Drawdowns

GLDM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDM drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDM and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.63%

-55.19%

+33.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.14%

-8.88%

-10.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-18.76%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-24.50%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.65%

-0.70%

-16.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-9.05%

+2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.69%

1.91%

+5.78%

Volatility

GLDM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that GLDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

2.84%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.99%

8.90%

+14.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.39%

11.83%

+14.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.91%

17.05%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

17.94%

-1.09%

GLDM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDM has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLDM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDM and SPY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDM dropped -21.63% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 13.83% for SPY. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 13.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLDM.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

GLDM is categorized as Gold, while SPY is S&P 500. GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLDM and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDM and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer