XTN vs. FSRFX
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio (FSRFX).
XTN is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Transportation Select Industry Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2011. FSRFX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 29, 1986.
Performance
XTN vs. FSRFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XTN vs. FSRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF | 2.02% | 6.33% | 4.86% | 25.22% | -28.10% | 33.68% | 12.11% | 21.85% | -17.26% | 21.55% |
FSRFX Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio | -0.92% | 11.45% | 1.01% | 19.29% | -10.21% | 27.79% | 12.83% | 18.43% | -11.02% | 22.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTN achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly higher than FSRFX's -0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, XTN has underperformed FSRFX with an annualized return of 8.43%, while FSRFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.
XTN
- 1D
- 3.95%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 26.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
FSRFX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -10.95%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XTN vs. FSRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRFX's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XTN vs. FSRFX — Risk / Return Rank
XTN
FSRFX
XTN vs. FSRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio (FSRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTN | FSRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.68 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.15 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.15 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.01 | +0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.60 | 3.47 | +1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTN | FSRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.68 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.32 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.47 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.57 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between XTN and FSRFX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XTN vs. FSRFX - Dividend Comparison
XTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than FSRFX's 4.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTN SPDR S&P Transportation ETF | 0.79% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 0.73% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 0.75% | 1.17% | 0.98% | 0.63% | 0.66% | 1.03% |
FSRFX Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio | 4.21% | 4.18% | 1.67% | 2.68% | 8.82% | 12.00% | 7.97% | 3.98% | 11.42% | 5.16% | 1.97% | 7.51% |
Drawdowns
XTN vs. FSRFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTN drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, smaller than the maximum FSRFX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTN and FSRFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTN | FSRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.77% | -60.34% | +16.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.28% | -14.28% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -28.97% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.77% | -41.11% | -2.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.15% | -11.69% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.97% | -8.68% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | 4.16% | +1.63% |
Volatility
XTN vs. FSRFX - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) has a higher volatility of 9.95% compared to Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio (FSRFX) at 6.89%. This indicates that XTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XTN | FSRFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.95% | 6.89% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.35% | 14.57% | +4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.25% | 25.09% | +7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 20.61% | +5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 21.82% | +4.06% |