FSRFX vs. FCNTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio (FSRFX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).
FSRFX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 29, 1986. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.
Performance
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRFX Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio | -0.92% | 11.45% | 1.01% | 19.29% | -10.21% | 27.79% | 12.83% | 18.43% | -11.02% | 22.00% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -8.57% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRFX achieves a -0.92% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRFX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 10.16%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.
FSRFX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -10.95%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 7.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
FCNTX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -9.40%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 6M
- -6.17%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRFX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSRFX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRFX
FCNTX
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio (FSRFX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSRFX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 0.83 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 1.30 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.17 | -0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 4.57 | -1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSRFX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.83 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.67 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.80 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.76 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRFX and FCNTX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
FSRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than FCNTX's 5.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRFX Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio | 4.21% | 4.18% | 1.67% | 2.68% | 8.82% | 12.00% | 7.97% | 3.98% | 11.42% | 5.16% | 1.97% | 7.51% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 5.10% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRFX drawdown since its inception was -60.34%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRFX and FCNTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRFX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.34% | -49.19% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.28% | -11.30% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.97% | -32.59% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.11% | -32.59% | -8.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.69% | -11.30% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.68% | -8.18% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 2.90% | +1.26% |
Volatility
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio (FSRFX) has a higher volatility of 6.89% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) at 5.19%. This indicates that FSRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSRFX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 5.19% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.57% | 10.56% | +4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.09% | 19.69% | +5.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 19.13% | +1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 19.61% | +2.21% |