FSRFX vs. FCNTX
FSRFX (Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FSRFX is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSRFX returned 12.45%/yr vs 16.85%/yr for FCNTX. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FSRFX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.
Performance
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSRFX achieves a 17.17% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 5.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FSRFX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 12.45%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.85% annualized return.
FSRFX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- YTD
- 17.17%
- 1Y
- 32.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.30%
FCNTX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- 6M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 13.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 16.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRFX Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio | 17.17% | 11.45% | 6.33% | 19.29% | -10.21% | 27.79% | 12.83% | 18.43% | -11.02% | 22.00% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund | 5.62% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSRFX and FCNTX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 1986 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FSRFX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSRFX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
FSRFX
FCNTX
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio (FSRFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSRFX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 1.19 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 4.65 | +3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSRFX drawdown since its inception was -60.34%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSRFX and FCNTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSRFX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.34% | -49.19% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.69% | -11.30% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | -19.75% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | -32.59% | +7.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.11% | -32.59% | -8.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.10% | -5.29% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -8.14% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 2.89% | +0.52% |
Volatility
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio (FSRFX) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.84%. This indicates that FSRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSRFX | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 3.84% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.44% | 12.26% | +4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.70% | 15.46% | +5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 19.37% | +1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.85% | 19.73% | +2.12% |
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSRFX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSRFX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
FSRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.94%, more than FCNTX's 4.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund | 4.42% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
FSRFX Fidelity Select Transportation Portfolio | 7.94% | 4.18% | 7.02% | 2.68% | 8.82% | 12.00% | 7.97% | 3.98% | 11.42% | 5.16% | 1.97% | 7.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSRFX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSRFX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to FCNTX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSRFX dropped -60.34% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.
FSRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSRFX and FCNTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer