PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTN vs. EVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTN vs. EVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTN achieves a 19.69% return, which is significantly higher than EVX's 5.86% return. Over the past 10 years, XTN has underperformed EVX with an annualized return of 10.20%, while EVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.88% annualized return.


XTN

1D
-0.36%
1M
-5.96%
6M
13.81%
YTD
19.69%
1Y
36.39%
3Y*
8.69%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
10.20%
ALL TIME*
10.72%

EVX

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.93%
6M
-0.07%
YTD
5.86%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
8.34%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
11.88%
ALL TIME*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$226.61K$218.18K$309.27K
$3.22M$3.69M$6.00M

XTN vs. EVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XTN
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
19.69%6.33%4.86%25.22%-28.10%33.68%12.11%21.85%-17.26%21.55%
EVX
VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF
5.86%11.72%12.99%12.97%-10.58%27.47%13.28%28.41%-3.82%16.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XTN and EVX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011

0.57

The correlation between XTN and EVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XTN vs. EVX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XTN
EVX

Industrials

94.7%
86.5%

Technology

5.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

8.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

3.9%

Energy

-

-0.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

1.4%

Industrials

XTN
94.7%
EVX
86.5%

Technology

XTN
5.3%
EVX

-

Basic Materials

XTN

-

EVX
8.2%

Communication Services

XTN

-

EVX

-

Consumer Cyclical

XTN

-

EVX

-

Consumer Defensive

XTN

-

EVX
3.9%

Energy

XTN

-

EVX
-0.0%

Financial Services

XTN

-

EVX

-

Healthcare

XTN

-

EVX

-

Real Estate

XTN

-

EVX

-

Utilities

XTN

-

EVX
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTN vs. EVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XTN
XTN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTN Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTN Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

EVX
EVX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
EVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
EVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XTN vs. EVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) and VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTNEVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.07

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

0.45

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.31

1.00

+4.31

XTN vs. EVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTN Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the EVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTN and EVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTN vs. EVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTN drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, smaller than the maximum EVX drawdown of -55.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTN and EVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTNEVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.77%

-55.91%

+12.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.28%

-10.85%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.69%

-17.36%

-16.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-21.45%

-13.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.77%

-41.01%

-2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-4.37%

-3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-8.72%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.18%

4.91%

+1.27%

Volatility

XTN vs. EVX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Transportation ETF (XTN) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) at 3.43%. This indicates that XTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTNEVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

3.43%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.33%

10.04%

+12.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.71%

13.97%

+13.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.86%

17.58%

+9.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.16%

20.23%

+5.93%

XTN vs. EVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTN has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EVX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTN vs. EVX - Dividend Comparison

XTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than EVX's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVX
VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF
0.18%0.19%0.46%0.95%0.41%0.24%0.32%0.38%0.38%0.89%0.70%1.16%
XTN
SPDR S&P Transportation ETF
0.67%0.78%0.93%0.73%1.04%1.02%0.75%1.17%0.98%0.63%0.66%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTN and EVX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTN has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to EVX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTN dropped -43.77% vs EVX's -55.91%.

On 10-year performance, EVX leads with 11.88% vs 10.20% for XTN. On fees, XTN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EVX has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EVX has performed better with a 11.88% return vs 10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EVX.

XTN has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.18% for EVX.

XTN tracks S&P Transportation Select Industry Index, while EVX tracks NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTN and 0.55% for EVX.

XTN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTN and EVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer