EVX vs. PHO
EVX (VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF) and PHO (Invesco Water Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVX is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index, while PHO is a Water Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EVX returned 12.19%/yr vs 11.78%/yr for PHO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PHO.
Performance
EVX vs. PHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVX achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly higher than PHO's -5.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EVX having a 12.19% annualized return and PHO not far behind at 11.78%.
EVX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 4.15%
- 6M
- 2.75%
- 1Y
- 4.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 12.19%
PHO
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- -5.09%
- 6M
- -6.73%
- 1Y
- -3.23%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
EVX vs. PHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 4.15% | 11.72% | 12.99% | 12.97% | -10.58% | 27.47% | 13.28% | 28.41% | -3.82% | 16.05% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | -5.09% | 7.62% | 8.59% | 18.85% | -14.86% | 31.28% | 20.83% | 37.57% | -6.40% | 23.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVX and PHO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2006 | 0.71 |
The correlation between EVX and PHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EVX vs. PHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EVX
PHO
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Industrials
EVX
PHO
Basic Materials
EVX
PHO
Consumer Defensive
EVX
PHO
-
Utilities
EVX
PHO
Communication Services
EVX
-
PHO
-
Consumer Cyclical
EVX
-
PHO
-
Financial Services
EVX
-
PHO
Healthcare
EVX
-
PHO
Real Estate
EVX
-
PHO
-
Technology
EVX
-
PHO
Energy
EVX
PHO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVX vs. PHO — Risk / Return Rank
EVX
PHO
EVX vs. PHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EVX | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.98 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | -0.24 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.99 | -0.56 | +1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EVX vs. PHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVX drawdown since its inception was -55.91%, roughly equal to the maximum PHO drawdown of -55.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVX and PHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVX | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.91% | -55.62% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -13.78% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.33% | -19.19% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.45% | -28.60% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.01% | -34.92% | -6.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -10.33% | +4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.75% | -10.18% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 5.79% | -0.98% |
Volatility
EVX vs. PHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) is 3.93%, while Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that EVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVX | PHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 4.40% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 11.31% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 15.17% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 18.39% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 19.45% | +0.80% |
EVX vs. PHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PHO's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVX vs. PHO - Dividend Comparison
EVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than PHO's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.46% | 0.95% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.16% |
PHO Invesco Water Resources ETF | 0.61% | 0.54% | 0.45% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.47% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EVX and PHO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHO has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to EVX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVX dropped -55.91% vs PHO's -55.62%.
On 10-year performance, EVX leads with 12.19% vs 11.78% for PHO. On fees, EVX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EVX has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EVX has performed better with a 12.19% return vs 11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EVX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PHO.
PHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.18% for EVX.
EVX is categorized as Industrials Equities, while PHO is Water Equities. EVX tracks NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index, while PHO tracks NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EVX and 0.59% for PHO.
EVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVX and PHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer