PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTL vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTL vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 62.17% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 14.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XTL has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 16.95%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.32% annualized return.


XTL

1D
3.28%
1M
8.43%
YTD
62.17%
6M
70.46%
1Y
143.57%
3Y*
50.79%
5Y*
20.95%
10Y*
16.95%

SPYG

1D
-0.15%
1M
8.31%
YTD
14.87%
6M
14.92%
1Y
36.19%
3Y*
28.58%
5Y*
16.62%
10Y*
18.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTL vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
62.17%44.95%34.89%-1.17%-19.18%21.58%22.46%12.51%-6.60%0.56%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
14.87%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XTL and SPYG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.66

The correlation between XTL and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XTL vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XTL
SPYG

Technology

61.4%
51.9%

Communication Services

36.1%
16.8%

Real Estate

2.6%
0.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.0%

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

8.5%

Healthcare

-

5.8%

Industrials

-

5.0%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Technology

XTL
61.4%
SPYG
51.9%

Communication Services

XTL
36.1%
SPYG
16.8%

Real Estate

XTL
2.6%
SPYG
0.6%

Basic Materials

XTL

-

SPYG
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XTL

-

SPYG
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

XTL

-

SPYG
1.0%

Energy

XTL

-

SPYG
0.1%

Financial Services

XTL

-

SPYG
8.5%

Healthcare

XTL

-

SPYG
5.8%

Industrials

XTL

-

SPYG
5.0%

Utilities

XTL

-

SPYG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTL vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTL
XTL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTL vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTLSPYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.02

2.27

+2.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.29

3.07

+2.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.39

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.91

2.71

+7.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

45.66

11.22

+34.43

XTL vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTL Sharpe Ratio is 5.02, which is higher than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTL and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTLSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.02

2.27

+2.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.79

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.89

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.36

+0.19

Drawdowns

XTL vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTLSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.01%

-67.63%

+30.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.70%

-13.76%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

-22.14%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.01%

-32.67%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.01%

-32.67%

-4.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-24.33%

+14.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.32%

-0.13%

Volatility

XTL vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.15%. This indicates that XTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTLSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

4.15%

+3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.61%

12.43%

+10.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.78%

16.04%

+12.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.04%

21.17%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

20.65%

+2.86%

XTL vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTL vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than SPYG's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.46%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
0.80%1.05%0.62%0.80%0.74%1.25%0.88%0.92%1.90%2.08%1.11%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTL and SPYG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTL has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to SPYG (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.32% vs 16.95% for XTL. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.32% return vs 16.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XTL.

XTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.46% for SPYG.

XTL is categorized as Communications Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTL and 0.04% for SPYG.

XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.02 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTL and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer