XTL vs. SMH
XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XTL returned 15.90%/yr vs 38.85%/yr for SMH. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XTL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 45.48% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 85.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XTL has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 15.90%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 38.85% annualized return.
XTL
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- 45.48%
- 6M
- 42.07%
- 1Y
- 105.42%
- 3Y*
- 46.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.85%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 16.07%
- YTD
- 85.74%
- 6M
- 85.96%
- 1Y
- 157.81%
- 3Y*
- 66.26%
- 5Y*
- 40.65%
- 10Y*
- 38.85%
XTL vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 45.48% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 85.74% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTL and SMH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.63 |
The correlation between XTL and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
XTL vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTL
SMH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XTL
SMH
Communication Services
XTL
SMH
-
Real Estate
XTL
SMH
-
Basic Materials
XTL
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XTL
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
XTL
-
SMH
-
Energy
XTL
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
XTL
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
XTL
-
SMH
-
Industrials
XTL
-
SMH
-
Utilities
XTL
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTL vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
XTL
SMH
XTL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XTL | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.66 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.21 | 10.63 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.34 | 38.91 | -10.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XTL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTL | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.01% | -84.96% | +47.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.70% | -14.93% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -35.74% | +12.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.01% | -45.30% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.01% | -45.30% | +8.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | 0.00% | -10.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.76% | -41.01% | +31.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 4.07% | -0.34% |
Volatility
XTL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) is 11.45%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.29%. This indicates that XTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTL | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.45% | 17.29% | -5.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.63% | 28.18% | -4.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.23% | 34.14% | -3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 35.68% | -10.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 32.95% | -9.26% |
XTL vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XTL and SMH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XTL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 1.29% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTL and SMH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (17.29%) compared to XTL (11.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 38.85% vs 15.90% for XTL. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, XTL has been the lower-risk option at 11.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 38.85% return vs 15.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL and SMH have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.17% for SMH.
XTL is categorized as Communications Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.66 vs 3.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTL and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer