PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTL vs. IYZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTL vs. IYZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 43.56% return, which is significantly higher than IYZ's 24.80% return. Over the past 10 years, XTL has outperformed IYZ with an annualized return of 15.75%, while IYZ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.34% annualized return.


XTL

1D
-1.32%
1M
-6.26%
YTD
43.56%
6M
40.96%
1Y
97.96%
3Y*
45.52%
5Y*
17.33%
10Y*
15.75%

IYZ

1D
0.33%
1M
-5.71%
YTD
24.80%
6M
24.25%
1Y
49.71%
3Y*
28.60%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
5.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTL vs. IYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
43.56%44.95%34.89%-1.17%-19.18%21.58%22.46%12.51%-6.60%0.56%
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
24.80%29.28%20.53%3.90%-30.29%11.69%4.13%16.14%-8.59%-11.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XTL and IYZ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011

0.77

The correlation between XTL and IYZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTL vs. IYZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTL
XTL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTL Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

IYZ
IYZ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTL vs. IYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTLIYZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.47

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.70

5.46

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.85

20.02

+5.83

XTL vs. IYZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTL Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is comparable to the IYZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTL and IYZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTL vs. IYZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, smaller than the maximum IYZ drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and IYZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTLIYZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.01%

-77.11%

+40.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.70%

-9.15%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

-13.85%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.01%

-39.74%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.01%

-39.74%

+2.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.48%

-8.27%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-40.07%

+30.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

2.49%

+1.31%

Volatility

XTL vs. IYZ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a higher volatility of 11.31% compared to iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) at 7.67%. This indicates that XTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTLIYZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.31%

7.67%

+3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.63%

15.53%

+8.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.22%

18.76%

+11.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.38%

18.90%

+6.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.66%

19.28%

+4.38%

XTL vs. IYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IYZ's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTL vs. IYZ - Dividend Comparison

XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than IYZ's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
1.67%2.04%1.94%2.27%2.55%2.51%2.60%2.36%2.15%3.54%2.27%1.98%
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
1.22%1.05%0.62%0.80%0.74%1.25%0.88%0.92%1.90%2.08%1.11%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTL and IYZ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XTL has higher volatility (11.31%) compared to IYZ (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs IYZ's -77.11%.

On 10-year performance, XTL leads with 15.75% vs 5.34% for IYZ. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XTL has performed better with a 15.75% return vs 5.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYZ.

IYZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.22% for XTL.

XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while IYZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTL and 0.42% for IYZ.

XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTL and IYZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer