XSW vs. XLF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XSW (SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSW returned 13.33%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for XLF. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSW charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.

Performance

XSW vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XSW having a -6.38% return and XLF slightly lower at -6.64%. Over the past 10 years, XSW has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 13.33%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 12.38% annualized return.

XSW

• 1D: -4.18%
• 1M: 9.35%
• YTD: -6.38%
• 6M: -7.49%
• 1Y: -4.24%
• 3Y*: 11.02%
• 5Y*: 1.69%
• 10Y*: 13.33%

XLF

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -1.38%
• YTD: -6.64%
• 6M: -4.18%
• 1Y: 1.13%
• 3Y*: 17.64%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: 12.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSW vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF	-6.38%	-0.90%	25.81%	38.60%	-34.22%	7.47%	52.41%	36.50%	7.67%	27.94%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	-6.64%	14.90%	30.56%	12.03%	-10.59%	34.80%	-1.74%	31.88%	-13.06%	22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XSW and XLF is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2011	0.55

The correlation between XSW and XLF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSW vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XSW	XLF
Technology	86.5%	1.8%
Financial Services	8.1%	98.0%
Communication Services	2.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	-
Industrials	0.8%	0.2%
Healthcare	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XSW vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSW

XSW Risk / Return Rank: 7
XSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
XSW Omega Ratio Rank: 7
XSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XSW Martin Ratio Rank: 7

XLF

XLF Risk / Return Rank: 9
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 9
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSW vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XSW	XLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	0.08	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	0.20	-0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.02	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	0.08	-0.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.27	0.20	-0.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSW vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSW Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSW and XLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XSW	XLF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	0.08	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.41	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.56	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.20	+0.42

Drawdowns

XSW vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSW drawdown since its inception was -45.38%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSW and XLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSW	XLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.38%	-82.69%	+37.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.75%	-14.79%	-18.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.75%	-15.54%	-18.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.38%	-25.81%	-19.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.38%	-42.86%	-2.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.64%	-9.34%	-5.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.83%	-20.03%	+10.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.71%	5.66%	+10.05%

Volatility

XSW vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 3.29%. This indicates that XSW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSW	XLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.68%	3.29%	+7.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.51%	10.94%	+12.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.63%	14.41%	+14.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.79%	18.63%	+10.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.25%	22.16%	+4.09%

XSW vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSW has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

XSW vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

XSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than XLF's 1.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.56%	1.31%	1.42%	1.71%	2.04%	1.63%	2.03%	1.87%	2.08%	1.48%	21.10%	1.95%
XSW SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF	0.04%	0.06%	0.07%	0.20%	0.09%	0.13%	0.26%	0.12%	0.31%	0.46%	0.87%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XSW and XLF in my portfolio?

XSW and XLF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XSW or XLF?

XSW has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to XLF (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSW dropped -45.38% vs XLF's -82.69%.

Which ETF is better, XSW or XLF?

On 10-year performance, XSW leads with 13.33% vs 12.38% for XLF. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XSW or XLF?

Over the 10-year period, XSW has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 12.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XSW or XLF?

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XSW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XSW or XLF?

XLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.04% for XSW.

What is the main difference between XSW and XLF?

XSW is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLF is Financials Equities. XSW tracks S&P Software & Services Select Industry Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSW and 0.08% for XLF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.