XSVM vs. USVM
XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - XSVM tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index while USVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSVM returned 9.51%/yr vs 11.31%/yr for USVM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSVM charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
XSVM vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than USVM's 20.14% return.
XSVM
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 32.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
USVM
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- YTD
- 20.14%
- 1Y
- 30.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.31%
- 10Y*
- —
XSVM vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 23.59% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 4.07% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 20.14% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSVM and USVM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XSVM and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSVM vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSVM
USVM
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
XSVM
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
XSVM
USVM
Real Estate
XSVM
USVM
Energy
XSVM
USVM
Industrials
XSVM
USVM
Basic Materials
XSVM
USVM
Technology
XSVM
USVM
Utilities
XSVM
USVM
Communication Services
XSVM
USVM
Consumer Defensive
XSVM
USVM
Healthcare
XSVM
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSVM vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
XSVM
USVM
XSVM vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSVM | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 3.71 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 13.98 | -3.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSVM vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSVM | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.57% | -42.38% | -20.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -8.36% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.21% | -24.34% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.21% | -25.27% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -0.92% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -7.81% | -3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 2.21% | +1.04% |
Volatility
XSVM vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a higher volatility of 4.40% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 3.46%. This indicates that XSVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSVM | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 3.46% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 10.86% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 14.83% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 19.57% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.00% | 21.91% | +3.09% |
XSVM vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSVM vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than USVM's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.83% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.78% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSVM and USVM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSVM has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to USVM (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 11.31% vs 9.51% for XSVM. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 11.31% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.78% for XSVM.
XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for XSVM and 0.29% for USVM.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSVM and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer