XRPR vs. ENFR
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. XRPR is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
XRPR vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -39.45% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 26.07% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- 6M
- -47.21%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 27.71%
- YTD
- 26.07%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 27.13%
- 5Y*
- 20.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
XRPR vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -39.45% | -41.98% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 26.07% | -0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and ENFR is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ENFR
XRPR vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPR | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, roughly equal to the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -68.28% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.87% | -3.84% | -61.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.66% | -15.89% | -27.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.50% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.43% | 15.06% | +61.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.43% | 19.27% | +57.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.43% | 24.65% | +51.78% |
XRPR vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.98% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and ENFR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
They also come from different issuers: REX and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.35% for ENFR.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer