XRPR vs. ENFR
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. XRPR is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
XRPR vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -39.79% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 25.22% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- -22.91%
- YTD
- -39.79%
- 6M
- -45.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 25.22%
- 6M
- 23.40%
- 1Y
- 27.06%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
XRPR vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -39.79% | -41.78% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 25.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and ENFR is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
ENFR
XRPR vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPR | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | 0.34 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.94% | -68.28% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.94% | -4.48% | -60.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -15.98% | -25.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.18% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.87% | 14.60% | +63.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 19.29% | +58.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.87% | 24.68% | +53.19% |
XRPR vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.01% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and ENFR have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
They also come from different issuers: REX and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.35% for ENFR.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer