PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRPR vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRPR vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -42.06% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 28.27% return.


XRPR

1D
-2.47%
1M
-2.58%
6M
-39.04%
YTD
-42.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

ENFR

1D
0.25%
1M
3.92%
6M
19.23%
YTD
28.27%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
26.80%
5Y*
21.89%
10Y*
12.14%
ALL TIME*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.27M$3.93M$3.16M
$159.08K$159.59K$242.33K

XRPR vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XRPR
REX-Osprey XRP ETF
-42.06%-41.98%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
28.27%-0.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPR and ENFR is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRPR vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRPR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRPR vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRPRENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

XRPR vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRPR vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, roughly equal to the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and ENFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRPRENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.27%

-68.28%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.38%

-2.57%

-63.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.14%

-15.83%

-29.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

Volatility

XRPR vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRPRENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.44%

15.24%

+59.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.44%

19.19%

+55.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.44%

24.65%

+49.79%

XRPR vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRPR vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
3.91%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
XRPR
REX-Osprey XRP ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRPR and ENFR have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.

XRPR is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ENFR is Infrastructure Equities. XRPR tracks XRP, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.35% for ENFR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRPR and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer