XRPR vs. BMNU
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a fund fund actively managed by REX, while BMNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BMNU.
Performance
XRPR vs. BMNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -37.98% return, which is significantly higher than BMNU's -79.92% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -15.16%
- YTD
- -37.98%
- 6M
- -40.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- -34.02%
- YTD
- -79.92%
- 6M
- -84.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPR vs. BMNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -37.98% | -34.30% |
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -79.92% | -80.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and BMNU is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. BMNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. BMNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -65.15%, smaller than the maximum BMNU drawdown of -97.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and BMNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.15% | -97.58% | +32.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.02% | -97.55% | +33.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.15% | -80.41% | +38.26% |
Volatility
XRPR vs. BMNU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.25% | 185.51% | -107.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.25% | 185.51% | -107.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.25% | 185.51% | -107.26% |
XRPR vs. BMNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. BMNU - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRPR nor BMNU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and BMNU have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
XRPR and BMNU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 1.50% for BMNU.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and BMNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer