XRPR vs. GBIL
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the XRP, while GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.
Performance
XRPR vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -42.06% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 1.99% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- -39.04%
- YTD
- -42.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GBIL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.17M | $51.25M | $70.01M | |
| $159.08K | $159.59K | $242.33K |
XRPR vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -42.06% | -41.98% |
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 1.99% | 1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and GBIL is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GBIL
XRPR vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPR | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 95.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 192.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2,308.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and GBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -0.76% | -66.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.38% | 0.00% | -66.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -0.04% | -45.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | GBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.44% | 0.22% | +74.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 0.58% | +73.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 0.47% | +73.97% |
XRPR vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF | 3.36% | 4.02% | 4.93% | 4.77% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 2.20% | 1.70% | 0.74% | 0.11% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and GBIL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPR.
GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
XRPR is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GBIL is Government Bonds. XRPR tracks XRP, while GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.12% for GBIL.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and GBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer