XRPR vs. NVII
XRPR (REX-Osprey XRP ETF) and NVII (REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPR is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the XRP, while NVII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. XRPR is passively managed, while NVII is actively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XRPR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVII.
Performance
XRPR vs. NVII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPR achieves a -42.06% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 9.94% return.
XRPR
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- 6M
- -39.04%
- YTD
- -42.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NVII
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- 6M
- 5.73%
- YTD
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 51.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.98M | $2.81M | $3.98M | |
| $159.08K | $159.59K | $242.33K |
XRPR vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | -42.06% | -41.98% |
NVII REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF | 9.94% | 11.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPR and NVII is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPR vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank
XRPR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVII
XRPR vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey XRP ETF (XRPR) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRPR | NVII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPR vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPR drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, which is greater than NVII's maximum drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPR and NVII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPR | NVII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.27% | -18.56% | -48.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.38% | -12.95% | -53.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.14% | -6.46% | -38.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.92% | — |
Volatility
XRPR vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPR | NVII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.44% | 37.09% | +37.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 35.93% | +38.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.44% | 35.93% | +38.51% |
XRPR vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than NVII's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPR vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison
XRPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVII REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF | 58.30% | 29.17% |
XRPR REX-Osprey XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPR and NVII have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRPR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRPR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.
NVII has the higher dividend yield at 58.30%, compared with 0.00% for XRPR.
XRPR is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NVII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPR and 0.99% for NVII.
Find the right allocation for XRPR and NVII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer