BMNU vs. MSTZ
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
BMNU vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -79.92% return, which is significantly lower than MSTZ's -35.10% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- -34.02%
- YTD
- -79.92%
- 6M
- -84.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- 5.10%
- 1M
- 83.66%
- YTD
- -35.10%
- 6M
- -24.64%
- 1Y
- 119.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -79.92% | -80.88% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -35.10% | 180.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and MSTZ is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
BMNU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTZ
BMNU vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNU | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -97.58%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.58% | -99.38% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -84.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.55% | -97.79% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.41% | -94.44% | +14.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 42.73% | — |
Volatility
BMNU vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 41.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 127.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 185.51% | 143.69% | +41.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 185.51% | 169.83% | +15.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 185.51% | 169.83% | +15.68% |
BMNU vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNU vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMNU nor MSTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
BMNU and MSTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BMNU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 1.05% for MSTZ.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer