PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMNU vs. TSYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMNU vs. TSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and TSPY Lift ETF (TSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BMNU

1D
-4.00%
1M
-34.02%
YTD
-79.92%
6M
-84.83%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSYX

1D
-0.59%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNU vs. TSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BMNU and TSYX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMNU vs. TSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and TSPY Lift ETF (TSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMNU vs. TSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMNU vs. TSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -97.58%, which is greater than TSYX's maximum drawdown of -13.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and TSYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNUTSYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.58%

-13.39%

-84.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.55%

-2.65%

-94.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.41%

-2.97%

-77.44%

Volatility

BMNU vs. TSYX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMNUTSYXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

185.51%

19.09%

+166.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

185.51%

19.09%

+166.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

185.51%

19.09%

+166.42%

BMNU vs. TSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSYX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMNU vs. TSYX - Dividend Comparison

BMNU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BMNU and TSYX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSYX is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSYX is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.

TSYX has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 0.00% for BMNU.

They also come from different issuers: REX and TappAlpha. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 0.98% for TSYX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMNU and TSYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer