BMNU vs. MSTU
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTU.
Performance
BMNU vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -81.71% return, which is significantly lower than MSTU's -70.88% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- -8.91%
- 1M
- -39.90%
- YTD
- -81.71%
- 6M
- -84.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTU
- 1D
- -10.37%
- 1M
- -61.22%
- YTD
- -70.88%
- 6M
- -73.38%
- 1Y
- -96.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -81.71% | -80.88% |
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -70.88% | -79.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and MSTU is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank
BMNU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTU
BMNU vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.76 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.23 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -97.77%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTU drawdown of -99.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and MSTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.77% | -99.06% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -97.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.77% | -99.06% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.50% | -72.57% | -7.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 78.30% | — |
Volatility
BMNU vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 44.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 114.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 185.23% | 142.01% | +43.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 185.23% | 168.53% | +16.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 185.23% | 168.53% | +16.70% |
BMNU vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNU vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMNU nor MSTU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and MSTU have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
BMNU and MSTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 1.05% for MSTU.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and MSTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer