CLF vs. WAB
Compare and contrast key facts about Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLF or WAB.
Correlation
The correlation between CLF and WAB is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CLF vs. WAB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CLF:
-1.16
WAB:
0.76
CLF:
-2.25
WAB:
1.15
CLF:
0.74
WAB:
1.17
CLF:
-0.73
WAB:
1.14
CLF:
-1.54
WAB:
3.19
CLF:
44.01%
WAB:
6.11%
CLF:
58.03%
WAB:
25.66%
CLF:
-98.78%
WAB:
-71.84%
CLF:
-92.60%
WAB:
-17.18%
Fundamentals
CLF:
$3.59B
WAB:
$29.66B
CLF:
-$1.57
WAB:
$6.04
CLF:
-0.22
WAB:
3.92
CLF:
$13.99B
WAB:
$7.89B
CLF:
-$154.00M
WAB:
$2.41B
CLF:
$145.00M
WAB:
$1.44B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLF achieves a -22.77% return, which is significantly lower than WAB's -8.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CLF has underperformed WAB with an annualized return of 5.00%, while WAB has yielded a comparatively higher 6.78% annualized return.
CLF
-22.77%
-23.34%
-43.28%
-68.20%
14.11%
5.00%
WAB
-8.33%
-2.29%
-3.53%
17.69%
32.47%
6.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLF vs. WAB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CLF
WAB
CLF vs. WAB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLF vs. WAB - Dividend Comparison
CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.40% |
WAB Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation | 0.49% | 0.42% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.66% | 0.62% | 0.68% | 0.54% | 0.43% | 0.39% | 0.23% |
Drawdowns
CLF vs. WAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLF drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, which is greater than WAB's maximum drawdown of -71.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF and WAB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLF vs. WAB - Volatility Comparison
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a higher volatility of 28.00% compared to Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) at 9.18%. This indicates that CLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CLF vs. WAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities