PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLF vs. STLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CLF and STLD is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

CLF vs. STLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
154.90%
3,750.04%
CLF
STLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLF:

-1.23

STLD:

-0.08

Sortino Ratio

CLF:

-2.14

STLD:

0.12

Omega Ratio

CLF:

0.76

STLD:

1.01

Calmar Ratio

CLF:

-0.61

STLD:

-0.09

Martin Ratio

CLF:

-1.67

STLD:

-0.19

Ulcer Index

CLF:

32.88%

STLD:

12.70%

Daily Std Dev

CLF:

44.81%

STLD:

31.66%

Max Drawdown

CLF:

-98.78%

STLD:

-87.05%

Current Drawdown

CLF:

-90.45%

STLD:

-25.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLF:

$4.89B

STLD:

$18.53B

EPS

CLF:

-$0.94

STLD:

$10.84

PEG Ratio

CLF:

-0.22

STLD:

10.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLF:

$19.97B

STLD:

$17.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLF:

$631.00M

STLD:

$3.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLF:

$932.00M

STLD:

$2.72B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLF achieves a -54.06% return, which is significantly lower than STLD's -1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CLF has underperformed STLD with an annualized return of 4.89%, while STLD has yielded a comparatively higher 22.29% annualized return.


CLF

YTD

-54.06%

1M

-19.55%

6M

-36.62%

1Y

-55.10%

5Y*

3.13%

10Y*

4.89%

STLD

YTD

-1.01%

1M

-20.19%

6M

-9.08%

1Y

-3.71%

5Y*

30.26%

10Y*

22.29%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLF vs. STLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLF, currently valued at -1.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-1.23-0.08
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLF, currently valued at -2.14, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-2.140.12
The chart of Omega ratio for CLF, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.761.01
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLF, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.61-0.09
The chart of Martin ratio for CLF, currently valued at -1.67, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-1.67-0.19
CLF
STLD

The current CLF Sharpe Ratio is -1.23, which is lower than the STLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLF and STLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.23
-0.08
CLF
STLD

Dividends

CLF vs. STLD - Dividend Comparison

CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%3.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.40%2.29%
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
1.56%1.44%1.39%1.68%2.71%2.82%2.50%1.44%1.57%3.09%2.33%2.25%

Drawdowns

CLF vs. STLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLF drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, which is greater than STLD's maximum drawdown of -87.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF and STLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-90.45%
-25.03%
CLF
STLD

Volatility

CLF vs. STLD - Volatility Comparison

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a higher volatility of 14.95% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) at 7.06%. This indicates that CLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
14.95%
7.06%
CLF
STLD

Financials

CLF vs. STLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and Steel Dynamics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab