CLF vs. NVDA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLF or NVDA.
Key characteristics
| CLF | NVDA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -15.38% | 73.30% |
| 1Y Return | 15.12% | 208.77% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.73% | 79.76% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.89% | 80.15% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 0.37% | 69.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.33 | 4.13 |
| Daily Std Dev | 39.78% | 49.46% |
| Max Drawdown | -98.79% | -89.72% |
| Current Drawdown | -82.41% | -9.67% |
Fundamentals
| CLF | NVDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.50B | $2.19T |
| EPS | $0.75 | $11.93 |
| PE Ratio | 23.84 | 73.54 |
| PEG Ratio | -0.22 | 1.07 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21.90B | $60.92B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.52B | $15.36B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.09B | $34.48B |
Correlation
The correlation between CLF and NVDA is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CLF vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CLF achieves a -15.38% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 73.30% return. Over the past 10 years, CLF has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 0.37%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLF vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLF vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
CLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.35% | 2.28% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% | 1.70% | 1.94% |
Drawdowns
CLF vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLF drawdown since its inception was -98.79%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF and NVDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLF vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) is 14.14%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 17.95%. This indicates that CLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CLF vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities