PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLF vs. ^DJI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLF vs. ^DJI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLF achieves a -13.25% return, which is significantly lower than ^DJI's 9.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CLF has underperformed ^DJI with an annualized return of 4.33%, while ^DJI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.10% annualized return.


CLF

1D
-0.95%
1M
16.84%
6M
-16.28%
YTD
-13.25%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
-13.29%
5Y*
-14.35%
10Y*
4.33%
ALL TIME*
6.98%

^DJI

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.78%
6M
7.35%
YTD
9.20%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
8.48%
10Y*
11.10%
ALL TIME*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$26.51T$25.71T$27.60T
$404.71M$285.99M$240.22M

CLF vs. ^DJI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
-13.25%41.28%-53.97%26.75%-26.00%49.52%77.38%12.72%6.66%-14.27%
^DJI
Dow Jones Industrial Average
9.20%12.97%12.88%13.70%-8.78%18.73%7.25%22.34%-5.63%25.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CLF and ^DJI is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1992

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLF vs. ^DJI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLF
CLF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLF Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
CLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLF Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

^DJI
^DJI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^DJI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^DJI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^DJI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
^DJI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
^DJI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLF vs. ^DJI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) and Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLF^DJIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.27

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

1.90

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

7.23

-6.89

CLF vs. ^DJI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the ^DJI Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLF and ^DJI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLF vs. ^DJI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLF drawdown since its inception was -98.78%, which is greater than ^DJI's maximum drawdown of -53.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLF and ^DJI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLF^DJIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.78%

-53.78%

-45.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.67%

-10.01%

-41.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.46%

-16.37%

-58.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.37%

-21.94%

-60.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.37%

-37.09%

-45.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.25%

-1.08%

-87.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.77%

-8.00%

-39.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.94%

2.63%

+25.31%

Volatility

CLF vs. ^DJI - Volatility Comparison

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a higher volatility of 20.47% compared to Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) at 3.76%. This indicates that CLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^DJI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLF^DJIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.47%

3.76%

+16.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.08%

9.89%

+40.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.52%

12.58%

+55.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.51%

14.86%

+44.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.07%

17.61%

+44.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLF and ^DJI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLF has higher volatility (20.47%) compared to ^DJI (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLF dropped -98.78% vs ^DJI's -53.78%.

^DJI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLF and ^DJI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer