PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLV vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLV vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYV

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.22%
YTD
7.46%
6M
7.77%
1Y
21.26%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
7.46%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and SPYV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2015

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between XRLV and SPYV has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XRLV vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLV
SPYV

Utilities

21.5%
4.4%

Financial Services

16.3%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%
9.2%

Real Estate

11.6%
3.3%

Healthcare

8.4%
11.6%

Industrials

7.2%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
10.9%

Technology

5.6%
21.2%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.4%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.2%

Energy

1.1%
7.4%

Utilities

XRLV
21.5%
SPYV
4.4%

Financial Services

XRLV
16.3%
SPYV
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

XRLV
15.3%
SPYV
9.2%

Real Estate

XRLV
11.6%
SPYV
3.3%

Healthcare

XRLV
8.4%
SPYV
11.6%

Industrials

XRLV
7.2%
SPYV
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLV
7.1%
SPYV
10.9%

Technology

XRLV
5.6%
SPYV
21.2%

Basic Materials

XRLV
3.1%
SPYV
3.4%

Communication Services

XRLV
2.8%
SPYV
3.2%

Energy

XRLV
1.1%
SPYV
7.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLV vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLV

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLV vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLVSPYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLVSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

Volatility

XRLV vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLVSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

XRLV vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XRLV vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than SPYV's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.70%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRLV and SPYV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.53% for XRLV.

XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.04% for SPYV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLV and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer