XRLV vs. FDIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS).
XRLV and FDIS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XRLV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response (USD) TR. It was launched on Apr 9, 2015. FDIS is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both XRLV and FDIS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XRLV or FDIS.
Correlation
The correlation between XRLV and FDIS is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XRLV vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XRLV:
1.07
FDIS:
0.41
XRLV:
1.48
FDIS:
0.75
XRLV:
1.21
FDIS:
1.10
XRLV:
1.53
FDIS:
0.38
XRLV:
4.95
FDIS:
1.21
XRLV:
2.79%
FDIS:
8.55%
XRLV:
12.92%
FDIS:
25.61%
XRLV:
-38.31%
FDIS:
-39.16%
XRLV:
-3.95%
FDIS:
-18.42%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRLV achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's -12.90% return. Over the past 10 years, XRLV has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 10.10%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.
XRLV
3.25%
-2.51%
1.67%
13.70%
12.49%
10.10%
FDIS
-12.90%
-3.00%
-3.41%
10.10%
14.87%
11.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XRLV vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XRLV vs. FDIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XRLV
FDIS
XRLV vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XRLV vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than FDIS's 0.85% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRLV Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 1.94% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.26% | 1.65% | 1.66% | 1.76% | 1.39% | 1.71% | 1.07% | 0.00% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% | 1.01% |
Drawdowns
XRLV vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRLV drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FDIS drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRLV and FDIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XRLV vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) is 8.62%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that XRLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.