PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLV vs. RPG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLV vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RPG

1D
0.16%
1M
11.54%
YTD
31.51%
6M
32.14%
1Y
41.04%
3Y*
28.39%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
14.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
31.51%13.41%28.23%8.04%-27.55%29.40%29.34%28.34%-4.53%26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and RPG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2015

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between XRLV and RPG has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XRLV vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLV
RPG

Utilities

21.5%
1.1%

Financial Services

16.3%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%
1.1%

Real Estate

11.6%
1.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
7.0%

Industrials

7.2%
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
17.1%

Technology

5.6%
39.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.5%

Communication Services

2.8%
8.8%

Energy

1.1%
1.4%

Utilities

XRLV
21.5%
RPG
1.1%

Financial Services

XRLV
16.3%
RPG
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

XRLV
15.3%
RPG
1.1%

Real Estate

XRLV
11.6%
RPG
1.1%

Healthcare

XRLV
8.4%
RPG
7.0%

Industrials

XRLV
7.2%
RPG
17.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLV
7.1%
RPG
17.1%

Technology

XRLV
5.6%
RPG
39.6%

Basic Materials

XRLV
3.1%
RPG
1.5%

Communication Services

XRLV
2.8%
RPG
8.8%

Energy

XRLV
1.1%
RPG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLV vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLV

RPG
RPG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLV vs. RPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLVRPGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLVRPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

Volatility

XRLV vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLVRPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.70%

XRLV vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRLV vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than RPG's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
0.17%0.24%0.25%1.44%0.74%0.00%0.46%0.83%0.47%0.56%0.43%0.73%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRLV and RPG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.

XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.

XRLV is categorized as S&P 500, while RPG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.35% for RPG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLV and RPG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer