PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLV vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and QQQ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2015

0.55

The correlation between XRLV and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRLV vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLV
QQQ

Utilities

21.5%
1.4%

Financial Services

16.3%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%
7.7%

Real Estate

11.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
4.2%

Industrials

7.2%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
12.3%

Technology

5.6%
53.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.1%

Communication Services

2.8%
15.8%

Energy

1.1%
0.6%

Utilities

XRLV
21.5%
QQQ
1.4%

Financial Services

XRLV
16.3%
QQQ
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

XRLV
15.3%
QQQ
7.7%

Real Estate

XRLV
11.6%
QQQ
0.1%

Healthcare

XRLV
8.4%
QQQ
4.2%

Industrials

XRLV
7.2%
QQQ
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLV
7.1%
QQQ
12.3%

Technology

XRLV
5.6%
QQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

XRLV
3.1%
QQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

XRLV
2.8%
QQQ
15.8%

Energy

XRLV
1.1%
QQQ
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLV

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLV vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLVQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLVQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

Volatility

XRLV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLVQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

XRLV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XRLV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRLV and QQQ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.

XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

XRLV is categorized as S&P 500, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.18% for QQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLV and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer