XRH0.L vs. SSLN.L
XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XRH0.L is a Metals fund tracking the Rhodium, while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L returned 27.32%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for SSLN.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
XRH0.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XRH0.L is traded in USD, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -28.17% return, which is significantly lower than SSLN.L's -16.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 27.32%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.54% annualized return.
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- -28.17%
- 6M
- -23.84%
- 1Y
- 40.60%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- -15.19%
- 10Y*
- 27.32%
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -21.24%
- YTD
- -16.70%
- 6M
- -21.79%
- 1Y
- 65.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
XRH0.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -28.17% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -4.46% | -15.51% | 183.21% | 132.83% | 46.39% | 100.00% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -16.70% | 147.64% | 21.15% | -1.25% | 3.38% | -12.63% | 45.36% | 17.20% | -8.94% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRH0.L and SSLN.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2011 | 0.10 |
The correlation between XRH0.L and SSLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (10 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRH0.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRH0.L
SSLN.L
XRH0.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRH0.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.32 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.91 | 2.94 | -1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRH0.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -83.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRH0.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -83.11% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.30% | -49.28% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.87% | -49.28% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.27% | -49.28% | -31.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.90% | -49.28% | -36.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.56% | -47.77% | -19.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.59% | -65.41% | +14.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.21% | 22.07% | -0.86% |
Volatility
XRH0.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 28.09% compared to iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) at 15.39%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRH0.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.09% | 15.39% | +12.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 70.45% | 54.63% | +15.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.78% | 57.77% | +32.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.02% | 38.46% | +30.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.84% | 32.49% | +34.35% |
XRH0.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRH0.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRH0.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRH0.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
XRH0.L is categorized as Metals, while SSLN.L is Silver. XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer