PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRH0.L vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XRH0.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XRH0.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRH0.L
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC
-18.78%205.23%-14.69%-60.81%-4.46%-15.51%183.21%132.83%46.39%100.00%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
10.47%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -18.78% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 29.16%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 14.11% annualized return.


XRH0.L

1D
2.48%
1M
-27.34%
YTD
-18.78%
6M
15.89%
1Y
56.04%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
-17.48%
10Y*
29.16%

GLD

1D
1.75%
1M
-10.65%
YTD
10.47%
6M
22.97%
1Y
52.25%
3Y*
33.69%
5Y*
22.00%
10Y*
14.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XRH0.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XRH0.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRH0.L
XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRH0.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRH0.LGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

1.89

-1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

2.31

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.35

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

2.70

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.04

9.90

-5.85

XRH0.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRH0.L and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRH0.LGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.89

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

1.25

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.89

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.63

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between XRH0.L and GLD is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XRH0.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRH0.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XRH0.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and GLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XRH0.LGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.90%

-45.56%

-40.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.33%

-19.21%

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.90%

-21.03%

-64.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.90%

-22.00%

-63.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.32%

-11.71%

-51.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.19%

-16.17%

-35.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.34%

5.25%

+9.09%

Volatility

XRH0.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 18.85% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 10.48%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XRH0.LGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.85%

10.48%

+8.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.89%

24.34%

+37.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.45%

27.81%

+46.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.40%

17.75%

+46.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.13%

15.88%

+48.25%