XRH0.L vs. IVV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).

XRH0.L and IVV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XRH0.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Rhodium. It was launched on May 19, 2011. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both XRH0.L and IVV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XRH0.L vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XRH0.L vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC	-18.78%	205.23%	-14.69%	-60.81%	-4.46%	-15.51%	183.21%	132.83%	46.39%	100.00%
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	-3.67%	17.85%	24.93%	26.31%	-18.16%	28.76%	18.40%	31.07%	-4.49%	21.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -18.78% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's -3.67% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed IVV with an annualized return of 29.16%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively lower 14.11% annualized return.

XRH0.L

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: -27.34%
• YTD: -18.78%
• 6M: 15.89%
• 1Y: 56.04%
• 3Y*: 10.70%
• 5Y*: -17.48%
• 10Y*: 29.16%

IVV

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -4.30%
• YTD: -3.67%
• 6M: -1.44%
• 1Y: 18.17%
• 3Y*: 18.58%
• 5Y*: 11.92%
• 10Y*: 14.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRH0.L vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.

XRH0.L

Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC

IVV

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

Return for Risk

XRH0.L vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRH0.L

XRH0.L Risk / Return Rank: 49
XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
XRH0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XRH0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 47
XRH0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XRH0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

IVV

IVV Risk / Return Rank: 60
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRH0.L vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XRH0.L	IVV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.00	-0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	1.52	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.23	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	1.54	+0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.04	7.28	-3.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XRH0.L vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRH0.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRH0.L and IVV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XRH0.L	IVV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	1.00	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.27	0.71	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.78	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.42	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between XRH0.L and IVV is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XRH0.L vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

XRH0.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	1.22%	1.17%	1.30%	1.44%	1.66%	1.20%	1.57%	1.85%	2.21%	1.75%	2.01%	2.27%

Drawdowns

XRH0.L vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and IVV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRH0.L	IVV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.90%	-55.25%	-30.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.33%	-12.06%	-22.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.90%	-24.53%	-61.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.90%	-33.90%	-52.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.32%	-5.57%	-57.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.19%	-10.84%	-40.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.34%	2.55%	+11.79%

Volatility

XRH0.L vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 18.85% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 5.34%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRH0.L	IVV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.85%	5.34%	+13.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.89%	9.47%	+52.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.45%	18.31%	+56.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.40%	16.89%	+47.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.13%	18.03%	+46.10%