XRH0.L vs. ZINC.L
XRH0.L (Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC) and ZINC.L (WisdomTree Zinc) are both Metals funds - XRH0.L tracks the Rhodium while ZINC.L tracks the Bloomberg Zinc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L returned 29.83%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for ZINC.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRH0.L charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ZINC.L.
Performance
XRH0.L vs. ZINC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRH0.L achieves a -15.94% return, which is significantly lower than ZINC.L's 16.49% return. Over the past 10 years, XRH0.L has outperformed ZINC.L with an annualized return of 29.83%, while ZINC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.61% annualized return.
XRH0.L
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- -15.94%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 71.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.42%
- 5Y*
- -13.72%
- 10Y*
- 29.83%
ZINC.L
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 7.33%
- YTD
- 16.49%
- 6M
- 18.96%
- 1Y
- 39.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
XRH0.L vs. ZINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRH0.L Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC | -15.94% | 205.23% | -14.69% | -60.81% | -4.46% | -15.51% | 183.21% | 132.83% | 46.39% | 100.00% |
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc | 16.49% | 6.70% | 13.11% | -9.01% | -11.08% | 26.65% | 15.73% | -0.07% | -22.41% | 27.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRH0.L and ZINC.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2011 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRH0.L vs. ZINC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XRH0.L
ZINC.L
XRH0.L vs. ZINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) and WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRH0.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.35 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 3.64 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.04 | 13.40 | -9.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRH0.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 2.14 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.24 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.32 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | -0.03 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
XRH0.L vs. ZINC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRH0.L drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than ZINC.L's maximum drawdown of -77.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRH0.L and ZINC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRH0.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -77.49% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.33% | -10.74% | -23.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.87% | -19.66% | -27.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.47% | -47.04% | -35.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.90% | -47.04% | -38.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.04% | -36.62% | -25.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.30% | -56.39% | +5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.73% | 2.91% | +14.82% |
Volatility
XRH0.L vs. ZINC.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Physical Rhodium ETC (XRH0.L) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) at 4.81%. This indicates that XRH0.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRH0.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.15% | 4.81% | +7.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.73% | 14.24% | +38.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.08% | 18.25% | +52.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.08% | 25.18% | +38.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.26% | 23.99% | +40.27% |
XRH0.L vs. ZINC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRH0.L has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ZINC.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRH0.L vs. ZINC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRH0.L nor ZINC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRH0.L and ZINC.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZINC.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZINC.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for XRH0.L.
XRH0.L tracks Rhodium, while ZINC.L tracks Bloomberg Zinc. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XRH0.L and 0.49% for ZINC.L.
Find the right allocation for XRH0.L and ZINC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer