XPP vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. XPP is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XPP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

XPP vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a -28.87% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.

XPP

• 1D: -3.49%
• 1M: -13.68%
• YTD: -28.87%
• 6M: -29.70%
• 1Y: -21.92%
• 3Y*: 3.54%
• 5Y*: -22.11%
• 10Y*: -6.09%

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPP vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	-28.87%	-4.89%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XPP and LINT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.26

XPP vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XPP	LINT
Financial Services	48.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XPP vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPP

XPP Risk / Return Rank: 4
XPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
XPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
XPP Omega Ratio Rank: 5
XPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
XPP Martin Ratio Rank: 3

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPP vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XPP	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	—	—

Drawdowns

XPP vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XPP	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.90%	-49.54%	-40.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.17%	-12.86%	-68.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.90%	-20.48%	-27.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.79%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XPP	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.48%	168.83%	-129.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.84%	168.83%	-105.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.79%	168.83%	-114.04%

XPP vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

XPP vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than LINT's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	3.05%	2.32%	2.96%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.81%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XPP and LINT in my portfolio?

XPP and LINT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XPP or LINT?

On fees, XPP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XPP or LINT?

XPP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XPP or LINT?

XPP has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.10% for LINT.

What is the main difference between XPP and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XPP and 0.97% for LINT.