LINT vs. YINN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. LINT is actively managed, while YINN is passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for YINN.

Performance

LINT vs. YINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 869.59% return, which is significantly higher than YINN's -39.21% return.

LINT

• 1D: 10.62%
• 1M: 28.51%
• YTD: 869.59%
• 6M: 899.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YINN

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: -16.16%
• YTD: -39.21%
• 6M: -41.14%
• 1Y: -30.38%
• 3Y*: -6.29%
• 5Y*: -39.95%
• 10Y*: -19.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINT vs. YINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	869.59%	5.81%
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	-39.21%	-7.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LINT and YINN is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.26

LINT vs. YINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LINT	YINN
Technology	100.0%	5.4%
Basic Materials	-	3.9%
Communication Services	-	16.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	26.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.9%
Energy	-	5.3%
Financial Services	-	34.8%
Healthcare	-	2.3%
Industrials	-	3.2%
Real Estate	-	1.1%
Utilities	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

LINT vs. YINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YINN

YINN Risk / Return Rank: 4
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 5
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINT vs. YINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LINT	YINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.52	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.45	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.95	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.56	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.15	—

Drawdowns

LINT vs. YINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, smaller than the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and YINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LINT	YINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.54%	-98.87%	+49.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-54.66%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-69.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-96.28%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-97.84%	+97.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.53%	-68.55%	+48.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	26.53%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LINT	YINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.55%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	43.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	168.26%	58.95%	+109.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	168.26%	94.30%	+73.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	168.26%	81.77%	+86.49%

LINT vs. YINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

LINT vs. YINN - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than YINN's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.09%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares	1.64%	1.12%	1.81%	4.17%	1.16%	0.73%	0.76%	1.38%	1.02%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LINT and YINN in my portfolio?

LINT and YINN have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LINT or YINN?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LINT or YINN?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LINT or YINN?

YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.09% for LINT.

What is the main difference between LINT and YINN?

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 1.52% for YINN.