PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LINT vs. YINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LINT vs. YINN

Last updated Jul 12, 2026
Documentation

LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) and YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - LINT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while YINN is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index (300%). LINT is actively managed, while YINN is passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LINT charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for YINN.

Performance

LINT vs. YINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 464.60% return, which is significantly higher than YINN's -39.86% return.

LINT

1D
-4.85%
1M
-27.23%
6M
279.62%
YTD
464.60%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

YINN

1D
0.60%
1M
-14.15%
6M
-44.08%
YTD
-39.86%
1Y
-35.50%
3Y*
-7.79%
5Y*
-38.66%
10Y*
-21.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINT vs. YINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares		464.60%5.81%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares		-39.86%-7.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LINT and YINN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.24

LINT vs. YINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LINT
YINN

Technology

100.0%
5.4%

Basic Materials

-

3.9%

Communication Services

-

16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

26.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.9%

Energy

-

5.3%

Financial Services

-

34.8%

Healthcare

-

2.3%

Industrials

-

3.2%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Technology

LINT
100.0%
YINN
5.4%

Basic Materials

LINT

-

YINN
3.9%

Communication Services

LINT

-

YINN
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

LINT

-

YINN
26.4%

Consumer Defensive

LINT

-

YINN
0.9%

Energy

LINT

-

YINN
5.3%

Financial Services

LINT

-

YINN
34.8%

Healthcare

LINT

-

YINN
2.3%

Industrials

LINT

-

YINN
3.2%

Real Estate

LINT

-

YINN
1.1%

Utilities

LINT

-

YINN
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares

Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares

Often compared with LINT:
LINT vs. INTWLINT vs. SOXLLINT vs. XXXXLINT vs. SPYQLINT vs. ARMGLINT vs. MSTULINT vs. AAPX
Often compared with YINN:
YINN vs. YANGYINN vs. KWEBYINN vs. CWEBYINN vs. CHAUYINN vs. XPPYINN vs. EDCYINN vs. MCHI

Return for Risk

LINT vs. YINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YINN
YINN Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINT vs. YINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

LINTYINNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

-0.60

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

-0.62

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

0.93

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

-0.58

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

-1.21

—

LINT vs. YINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LINT vs. YINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, smaller than the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and YINN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LINTYINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-98.87%

+49.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-61.64%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-69.08%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-95.56%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-98.59%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.77%

-97.87%

+56.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.81%

-68.64%

+47.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

29.67%

—

Volatility

LINT vs. YINN - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LINTYINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

18.27%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

43.42%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

168.20%

59.49%

+108.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.20%

94.16%

+74.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.20%

81.55%

+86.65%

LINT vs. YINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

LINT vs. YINN - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than YINN's 1.48% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares		0.48%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares		1.48%1.12%1.81%4.17%1.16%0.73%0.76%1.38%1.02%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

LINT and YINN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.48% for LINT.

LINT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while YINN is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 1.52% for YINN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINT and YINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer