PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LINT vs. MSTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LINT vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LINT achieves a 562.84% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -54.27% return.


LINT

1D
9.00%
1M
30.35%
YTD
562.84%
6M
362.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTU

1D
-14.03%
1M
-55.66%
YTD
-54.27%
6M
-71.83%
1Y
-95.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LINT vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
562.84%5.79%
MSTU
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
-54.27%-38.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LINT and MSTU is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

0.23

LINT vs. MSTU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LINT
MSTU

Technology

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

LINT
100.0%
MSTU
100.0%

Basic Materials

LINT

-

MSTU

-

Communication Services

LINT

-

MSTU

-

Consumer Cyclical

LINT

-

MSTU

-

Consumer Defensive

LINT

-

MSTU

-

Energy

LINT

-

MSTU

-

Financial Services

LINT

-

MSTU

-

Healthcare

LINT

-

MSTU

-

Industrials

LINT

-

MSTU

-

Real Estate

LINT

-

MSTU

-

Utilities

LINT

-

MSTU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LINT vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LINT

MSTU
MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LINT vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LINT vs. MSTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LINTMSTUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

24.05

-0.40

+24.45

Drawdowns

LINT vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LINT drawdown since its inception was -49.54%, smaller than the maximum MSTU drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LINT and MSTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LINTMSTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.54%

-98.58%

+49.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.55%

-98.52%

+71.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.51%

-71.94%

+51.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

75.17%

Volatility

LINT vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LINTMSTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

111.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

163.04%

138.62%

+24.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

163.04%

169.06%

-6.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

163.04%

169.06%

-6.02%

LINT vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LINT has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

LINT vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


LINT and MSTU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LINT and 1.05% for MSTU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LINT and MSTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer