XPP vs. BITU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XPP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XPP returned -5.89% vs -73.07% for BITU. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

XPP vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a -17.68% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -52.92% return.

XPP

• 1D: -4.83%
• 1M: -6.40%
• YTD: -17.68%
• 6M: -20.01%
• 1Y: -5.89%
• 3Y*: 7.34%
• 5Y*: -20.12%
• 10Y*: -5.30%

BITU

• 1D: -5.58%
• 1M: -34.84%
• YTD: -52.92%
• 6M: -59.11%
• 1Y: -73.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPP vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	-17.68%	45.84%	38.29%
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	-52.92%	-37.07%	37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XPP and BITU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024	0.25

XPP vs. BITU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XPP	BITU
Financial Services	42.1%	4.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XPP vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPP

XPP Risk / Return Rank: 7
XPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
XPP Omega Ratio Rank: 8
XPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XPP Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BITU

BITU Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPP vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XPP	BITU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	-0.84	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.06	-1.44	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.84	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	-0.93	+0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.37	-1.47	+1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XPP vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPP Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPP and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XPP	BITU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	-0.84	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	-0.35	+0.25

Drawdowns

XPP vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and BITU.

Drawdown Indicators

	XPP	BITU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.90%	-78.94%	-10.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.60%	-78.94%	+46.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.21%	-78.94%	+0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.82%	-34.49%	-13.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.95%	49.84%	-33.89%

Volatility

XPP vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) is 14.45%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that XPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XPP	BITU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.45%	18.99%	-4.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.79%	69.41%	-40.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.27%	87.00%	-47.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.75%	97.45%	-34.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.91%	97.45%	-42.54%

XPP vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XPP and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

XPP vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than BITU's 83.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	83.36%	50.23%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	2.63%	2.32%	2.96%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.81%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XPP and BITU in my portfolio?

XPP and BITU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XPP or BITU?

BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to XPP (14.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPP dropped -89.90% vs BITU's -78.94%.

Which ETF is better, XPP or BITU?

On 1-year performance, XPP leads with -5.89% vs -73.07% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, XPP has been the lower-risk option at 14.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XPP or BITU?

Over the 1-year period, XPP has performed better with a -5.89% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XPP or BITU?

XPP and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XPP or BITU?

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 2.63% for XPP.

What is the main difference between XPP and BITU?

XPP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.