XOUT vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - XOUT tracks the XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOUT returned 8.53%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

XOUT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -10.33% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 1.35% return.

XOUT

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -4.09%
• YTD: -10.33%
• 6M: -11.73%
• 1Y: -0.34%
• 3Y*: 15.07%
• 5Y*: 8.53%
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 18.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOUT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF	-10.33%	18.18%	23.11%	42.32%	-28.18%	26.13%	28.71%	11.72%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.35%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XOUT and SCHG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2019	0.92

The correlation between XOUT and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XOUT vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XOUT	SCHG
Technology	35.1%	46.7%
Healthcare	17.3%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	15.4%	12.4%
Communication Services	12.4%	15.3%
Financial Services	9.6%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	1.6%
Industrials	3.3%	6.0%
Basic Materials	0.6%	1.3%
Real Estate	0.4%	0.5%
Energy	0.2%	0.7%
Utilities	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

XOUT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOUT

XOUT Risk / Return Rank: 8
XOUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
XOUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
XOUT Omega Ratio Rank: 8
XOUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
XOUT Martin Ratio Rank: 8

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOUT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XOUT	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	1.11	-1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	1.56	-1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.20	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	1.10	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.04	3.58	-3.62

XOUT vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOUT Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOUT and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XOUT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOUT	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.29%	-34.59%	+3.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.21%	-16.41%	-6.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.77%	-23.39%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.29%	-34.59%	+3.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.97%	-6.46%	-6.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-5.20%	-3.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.55%	5.02%	+4.53%

Volatility

XOUT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that XOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XOUT	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.52%	5.91%	+2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.61%	12.52%	+4.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.02%	16.24%	+3.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.87%	22.38%	-0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.22%	21.58%	+1.64%

XOUT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

XOUT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.40%	0.51%	0.28%	0.53%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOUT and SCHG in my portfolio?

XOUT and SCHG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XOUT or SCHG?

XOUT has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, XOUT or SCHG?

On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 13.27% vs 8.53% for XOUT. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XOUT or SCHG?

Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 13.27% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XOUT or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XOUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XOUT or SCHG?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.

What is the main difference between XOUT and SCHG?

XOUT tracks XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.