XOUT vs. HDV
XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOUT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOUT returned 8.53%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for HDV. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
XOUT vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -10.33% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 14.07% return.
XOUT
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- -10.33%
- 6M
- -11.73%
- 1Y
- -0.34%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
XOUT vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | -10.33% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.72% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 14.07% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 6.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOUT and HDV is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2019 | 0.41 |
The correlation between XOUT and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XOUT vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOUT
HDV
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
XOUT
HDV
Healthcare
XOUT
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
XOUT
HDV
Communication Services
XOUT
HDV
Financial Services
XOUT
HDV
Consumer Defensive
XOUT
HDV
Industrials
XOUT
HDV
Basic Materials
XOUT
HDV
Real Estate
XOUT
HDV
-
Energy
XOUT
HDV
Utilities
XOUT
-
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOUT vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
XOUT
HDV
XOUT vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOUT | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.36 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 4.09 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 11.19 | -11.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOUT vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOUT | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -37.04% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -5.18% | -18.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -10.49% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -15.42% | -15.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.97% | -1.35% | -11.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -3.08% | -5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.55% | 1.89% | +7.66% |
Volatility
XOUT vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.64%. This indicates that XOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOUT | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 3.64% | +4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.61% | 7.61% | +9.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 9.93% | +10.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 12.81% | +9.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 15.73% | +7.49% |
XOUT vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOUT vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.90% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOUT and HDV have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOUT has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to HDV (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 5-year performance, HDV leads with 11.09% vs 8.53% for XOUT. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDV has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XOUT.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.
XOUT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HDV is Dividend. XOUT tracks XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOUT and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer