XOMO vs. MRNY
XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) and MRNY (YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XOMO returned 31.19% vs 48.50% for MRNY. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOMO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MRNY.
Performance
XOMO vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 16.03% return, which is significantly lower than MRNY's 47.14% return.
XOMO
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 16.03%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 31.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MRNY
- 1D
- -5.48%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 47.14%
- 6M
- 49.33%
- 1Y
- 48.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 16.03% | 6.90% | 6.11% | -3.75% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 47.14% | -35.72% | -59.32% | 19.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOMO and MRNY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2023 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOMO vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank
XOMO
MRNY
XOMO vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOMO | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.20 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 1.55 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.30 | 3.01 | +3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOMO | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 0.98 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -0.51 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
XOMO vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and MRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOMO | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -82.15% | +63.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -31.53% | +17.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -69.02% | +58.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -52.66% | +45.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 16.17% | -11.21% |
Volatility
XOMO vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is 6.82%, while YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a volatility of 14.57%. This indicates that XOMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOMO | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 14.57% | -7.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 37.45% | -20.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.05% | 49.69% | -29.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 50.82% | -31.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 50.82% | -31.89% |
XOMO vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MRNY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOMO vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison
XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.93%, less than MRNY's 105.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 105.86% | 145.98% | 178.49% | 1.75% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 35.93% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOMO and MRNY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRNY has higher volatility (14.57%) compared to XOMO (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs MRNY's -82.15%.
On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 48.50% vs 31.19% for XOMO. On fees, MRNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 48.50% return vs 31.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MRNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 105.86%, compared with 35.93% for XOMO.
Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.99% for MRNY.
XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOMO and MRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer