PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMO vs. MRNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMO vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 16.03% return, which is significantly lower than MRNY's 47.14% return.


XOMO

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.20%
YTD
16.03%
6M
18.72%
1Y
31.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MRNY

1D
-5.48%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
47.14%
6M
49.33%
1Y
48.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMO vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
16.03%6.90%6.11%-3.75%
MRNY
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF
47.14%-35.72%-59.32%19.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and MRNY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2023

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMO vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

MRNY
MRNY Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOMOMRNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

1.55

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.30

3.01

+3.29

XOMO vs. MRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the MRNY Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMO and MRNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOMOMRNYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

0.98

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

-0.51

+0.88

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and MRNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMOMRNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-82.15%

+63.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-31.53%

+17.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.83%

-69.02%

+58.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-52.66%

+45.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.96%

16.17%

-11.21%

Volatility

XOMO vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is 6.82%, while YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a volatility of 14.57%. This indicates that XOMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMOMRNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

14.57%

-7.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

37.45%

-20.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.05%

49.69%

-29.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

50.82%

-31.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

50.82%

-31.89%

XOMO vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than MRNY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMO vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.93%, less than MRNY's 105.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MRNY
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF
105.86%145.98%178.49%1.75%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
35.93%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMO and MRNY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRNY has higher volatility (14.57%) compared to XOMO (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs MRNY's -82.15%.

On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 48.50% vs 31.19% for XOMO. On fees, MRNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 48.50% return vs 31.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MRNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 105.86%, compared with 35.93% for XOMO.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.99% for MRNY.

XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMO and MRNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer