MRNY vs. FBY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MRNY (YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF) and FBY (YieldMax META Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MRNY returned 47.46% vs -6.53% for FBY. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

MRNY vs. FBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRNY achieves a 51.59% return, which is significantly higher than FBY's -5.84% return.

MRNY

• 1D: 5.73%
• 1M: 4.23%
• YTD: 51.59%
• 6M: 62.21%
• 1Y: 47.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBY

• 1D: 3.88%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: -5.84%
• 6M: -4.65%
• 1Y: -6.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRNY vs. FBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF	51.59%	-35.72%	-59.32%	19.61%
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	-5.84%	1.98%	44.42%	13.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MRNY and FBY is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2023	0.18

Return for Risk

MRNY vs. FBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRNY

MRNY Risk / Return Rank: 28
MRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 29
MRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
MRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 23

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 6
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRNY vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) and YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MRNY	FBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	-0.23	+1.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	-0.12	+1.81
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	0.98	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	-0.22	+1.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.95	-0.49	+3.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MRNY vs. FBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the FBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRNY and FBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MRNY	FBY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	-0.23	+1.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.49	0.64	-1.13

Drawdowns

MRNY vs. FBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRNY drawdown since its inception was -82.15%, which is greater than FBY's maximum drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRNY and FBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRNY	FBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.15%	-31.53%	-50.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.53%	-29.50%	-2.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.09%	-19.08%	-49.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.62%	-7.82%	-44.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.15%	13.41%	+2.74%

Volatility

MRNY vs. FBY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a higher volatility of 13.36% compared to YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) at 7.24%. This indicates that MRNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRNY	FBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.36%	7.24%	+6.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.05%	22.27%	+14.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.37%	28.89%	+20.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.76%	28.53%	+22.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.76%	28.53%	+22.23%

MRNY vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MRNY and FBY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

MRNY vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison

MRNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 100.06%, more than FBY's 55.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	55.74%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF	100.06%	145.98%	178.49%	1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRNY and FBY in my portfolio?

MRNY and FBY have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MRNY or FBY?

MRNY has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to FBY (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRNY dropped -82.15% vs FBY's -31.53%.

Which ETF is better, MRNY or FBY?

On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 47.46% vs -6.53% for FBY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, FBY has been the lower-risk option at 7.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MRNY or FBY?

Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 47.46% return vs -6.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MRNY or FBY?

MRNY and FBY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MRNY or FBY?

MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 100.06%, compared with 55.74% for FBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.