MRNY vs. CONY
MRNY (YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MRNY returned 42.90% vs -36.44% for CONY. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MRNY vs. CONY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRNY achieves a 43.37% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -20.81% return.
MRNY
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 43.37%
- 6M
- 59.24%
- 1Y
- 42.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY
- 1D
- -3.59%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -29.16%
- 1Y
- -36.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MRNY vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 43.37% | -35.72% | -59.32% | 19.61% |
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -20.81% | -26.34% | 23.62% | 67.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRNY and CONY is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2023 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRNY vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank
MRNY
CONY
MRNY vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MRNY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | -0.63 | +1.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | -0.69 | +2.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.92 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | -0.57 | +1.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | -0.96 | +3.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MRNY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | -0.63 | +1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | 0.17 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
MRNY vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRNY drawdown since its inception was -82.15%, which is greater than CONY's maximum drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRNY and CONY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRNY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.15% | -63.57% | -18.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.53% | -63.39% | +31.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.82% | -55.14% | -14.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.59% | -22.12% | -30.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.14% | 37.50% | -21.36% |
Volatility
MRNY vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) is 12.56%, while YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a volatility of 15.91%. This indicates that MRNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRNY | CONY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.56% | 15.91% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.22% | 43.50% | -6.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.07% | 58.03% | -8.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.67% | 60.00% | -9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.67% | 60.00% | -9.33% |
MRNY vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MRNY and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MRNY vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison
MRNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.80%, less than CONY's 178.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 178.59% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 105.80% | 145.98% | 178.49% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MRNY and CONY have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONY has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to MRNY (12.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRNY dropped -82.15% vs CONY's -63.57%.
On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 42.90% vs -36.44% for CONY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MRNY has been the lower-risk option at 12.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 42.90% return vs -36.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MRNY and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 178.59%, compared with 105.80% for MRNY.
MRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRNY and CONY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer