XOEF vs. RSPG

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

XOEF (iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF) and RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEF is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XOEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPG.

Performance

XOEF vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 24.87% return.

XOEF

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 3.14%
• YTD: 16.44%
• 6M: 15.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSPG

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -3.28%
• YTD: 24.87%
• 6M: 25.05%
• 1Y: 34.66%
• 3Y*: 15.73%
• 5Y*: 20.17%
• 10Y*: 8.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF	16.44%	4.27%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	24.87%	3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and RSPG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.11

Return for Risk

XOEF vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RSPG

RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 51
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XOEF	RSPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.59	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.12	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.54	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.12	—

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and RSPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOEF	RSPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.66%	-79.98%	+72.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.72%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.44%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-12.27%	+12.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-25.41%	+24.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XOEF	RSPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.89%	21.91%	-9.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.89%	28.20%	-15.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.89%	33.49%	-20.60%

XOEF vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XOEF vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than RSPG's 2.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	2.13%	2.60%	2.43%	2.84%	3.43%	2.37%	3.15%	2.15%	2.18%	2.55%	1.14%	2.80%
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF	1.04%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOEF and RSPG in my portfolio?

XOEF and RSPG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XOEF or RSPG?

On fees, XOEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XOEF or RSPG?

XOEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XOEF or RSPG?

RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.04% for XOEF.

What is the main difference between XOEF and RSPG?

XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPG is Energy Equities. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.40% for RSPG.