PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPG vs. VDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPG vs. VDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a 34.27% return, which is significantly higher than VDE's 32.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPG having a 9.73% annualized return and VDE not far behind at 9.70%.


RSPG

1D
1.25%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
34.27%
6M
28.95%
1Y
47.49%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
21.10%
10Y*
9.73%

VDE

1D
1.13%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
32.24%
6M
29.32%
1Y
45.53%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
20.43%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPG vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
34.27%7.01%6.09%4.49%57.97%57.73%-32.44%13.38%-24.68%-6.39%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
32.24%7.11%6.75%0.03%62.89%56.31%-33.02%9.28%-19.95%-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPG and VDE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006

0.93

The correlation between RSPG and VDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPG vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPG
VDE

Energy

100.0%
99.5%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

RSPG
100.0%
VDE
99.5%

Financial Services

RSPG
0.0%
VDE

-

Basic Materials

RSPG

-

VDE
0.4%

Communication Services

RSPG

-

VDE

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPG

-

VDE

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPG

-

VDE

-

Healthcare

RSPG

-

VDE

-

Industrials

RSPG

-

VDE
0.1%

Real Estate

RSPG

-

VDE

-

Technology

RSPG

-

VDE

-

Utilities

RSPG

-

VDE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPG vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPG
RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VDE
VDE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPG vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPGVDEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.20

2.25

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

2.88

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

3.88

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.59

11.42

+0.17

RSPG vs. VDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPG Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the VDE Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPG and VDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPGVDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.25

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.78

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.33

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.28

-0.10

Drawdowns

RSPG vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than VDE's maximum drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and VDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPGVDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.98%

-74.20%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-11.80%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.06%

-21.41%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.44%

-26.58%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

-69.29%

-3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.67%

-6.43%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.47%

-19.96%

-5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

4.00%

+0.11%

Volatility

RSPG vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) have volatilities of 8.19% and 7.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPGVDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

7.99%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.77%

16.33%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.69%

20.38%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.31%

26.40%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.57%

29.93%

+3.64%

RSPG vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPG vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison

RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than VDE's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
1.94%2.60%2.43%2.84%3.43%2.37%3.15%2.15%2.18%2.55%1.14%2.80%
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
2.37%3.11%3.23%3.34%3.65%4.13%4.76%3.42%3.35%2.90%2.31%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, RSPG and VDE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RSPG has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to VDE (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPG dropped -79.98% vs VDE's -74.20%.

On 10-year performance, RSPG leads with 9.73% vs 9.70% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 7.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPG has performed better with a 9.73% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.

VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.94% for RSPG.

RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPG and 0.10% for VDE.

VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPG and VDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer