RSPG vs. VDE
RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - RSPG tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index while VDE tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPG returned 9.73%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for VDE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPG charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VDE.
Performance
RSPG vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPG achieves a 34.27% return, which is significantly higher than VDE's 32.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPG having a 9.73% annualized return and VDE not far behind at 9.70%.
RSPG
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 34.27%
- 6M
- 28.95%
- 1Y
- 47.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 21.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
VDE
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- 32.24%
- 6M
- 29.32%
- 1Y
- 45.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
RSPG vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 34.27% | 7.01% | 6.09% | 4.49% | 57.97% | 57.73% | -32.44% | 13.38% | -24.68% | -6.39% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 32.24% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPG and VDE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006 | 0.93 |
The correlation between RSPG and VDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPG vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPG
VDE
Energy
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
RSPG
VDE
Financial Services
RSPG
VDE
-
Basic Materials
RSPG
-
VDE
Communication Services
RSPG
-
VDE
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPG
-
VDE
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPG
-
VDE
-
Healthcare
RSPG
-
VDE
-
Industrials
RSPG
-
VDE
Real Estate
RSPG
-
VDE
-
Technology
RSPG
-
VDE
-
Utilities
RSPG
-
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPG vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
RSPG
VDE
RSPG vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPG | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.20 | 2.25 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.80 | 2.88 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 3.88 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 11.42 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPG | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.25 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.78 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.33 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.28 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
RSPG vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than VDE's maximum drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPG | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.98% | -74.20% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.18% | -11.80% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.06% | -21.41% | -1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.44% | -26.58% | -1.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.17% | -69.29% | -3.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.67% | -6.43% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.47% | -19.96% | -5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 4.00% | +0.11% |
Volatility
RSPG vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) have volatilities of 8.19% and 7.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPG | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 7.99% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 16.33% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.69% | 20.38% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.31% | 26.40% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 29.93% | +3.64% |
RSPG vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPG vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than VDE's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF | 1.94% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.84% | 3.43% | 2.37% | 3.15% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.55% | 1.14% | 2.80% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.37% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, RSPG and VDE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RSPG has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to VDE (7.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPG dropped -79.98% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, RSPG leads with 9.73% vs 9.70% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 7.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSPG has performed better with a 9.73% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.94% for RSPG.
RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPG and 0.10% for VDE.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPG and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer