PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RSPG vs. XLE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


RSPGXLE
YTD Return14.90%15.22%
1Y Return16.46%16.92%
3Y Return (Ann)22.30%22.62%
5Y Return (Ann)17.10%15.01%
10Y Return (Ann)3.52%4.94%
Sharpe Ratio0.951.02
Sortino Ratio1.371.46
Omega Ratio1.171.18
Calmar Ratio1.311.37
Martin Ratio3.013.19
Ulcer Index5.90%5.71%
Daily Std Dev18.66%17.83%
Max Drawdown-79.98%-71.54%
Current Drawdown-2.12%-2.30%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between RSPG and XLE is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

RSPG vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSPG having a 14.90% return and XLE slightly higher at 15.22%. Over the past 10 years, RSPG has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 3.52%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 4.94% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.50%
2.40%
RSPG
XLE

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSPG vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.13% expense ratio.


RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Expense ratio chart for RSPG: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%
Expense ratio chart for XLE: current value at 0.13% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.13%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSPG vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RSPG, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.95
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RSPG, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RSPG, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RSPG, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RSPG, currently valued at 3.01, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.01
XLE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLE, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.02
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLE, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.46
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLE, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLE, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLE, currently valued at 3.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.19

RSPG vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPG Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPG and XLE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.95
1.02
RSPG
XLE

Dividends

RSPG vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than XLE's 3.16% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
2.48%2.84%3.43%2.37%3.15%2.15%2.18%2.55%1.14%2.80%1.97%0.98%
XLE
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund
3.16%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%5.73%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%2.35%1.73%

Drawdowns

RSPG vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and XLE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.12%
-2.30%
RSPG
XLE

Volatility

RSPG vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) at 5.91%. This indicates that RSPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.92%
5.91%
RSPG
XLE