PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RSPG vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

RSPG vs. XLE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE).

RSPG and XLE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. XLE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Energy Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both RSPG and XLE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RSPG vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSPG vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF		38.21%7.01%6.09%4.49%57.97%57.73%-32.44%13.38%-24.68%-6.39%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF		37.91%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RSPG having a 38.21% return and XLE slightly lower at 37.91%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPG having a 11.62% annualized return and XLE not far ahead at 11.65%.

RSPG

1D
-1.17%
1M
10.24%
YTD
38.21%
6M
39.08%
1Y
37.07%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
24.76%
10Y*
11.62%

XLE

1D
-1.13%
1M
10.27%
YTD
37.91%
6M
39.21%
1Y
35.32%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
23.99%
10Y*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF

Often compared with RSPG:
RSPG vs. SCHGRSPG vs. VDERSPG vs. IUES.LRSPG vs. SPYRSPG vs. MLPXRSPG vs. ENFRRSPG vs. CNRG
Often compared with XLE:
XLE vs. VDEXLE vs. USOXLE vs. XOPXLE vs. XLUXLE vs. XLKXLE vs. IXCXLE vs. FENY

RSPG vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.

RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF

Return for Risk

RSPG vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RSPG
RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPG vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RSPGXLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.42

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

1.84

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.96

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.12

5.16

-0.04

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPG vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPG and XLE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RSPGXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.42

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.93

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.40

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.32

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between RSPG and XLE is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RSPG vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

RSPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than XLE's 2.44% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPG
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF		1.89%2.60%2.43%2.84%3.43%2.37%3.15%2.15%2.18%2.55%1.14%2.80%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF		2.44%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Drawdowns

RSPG vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPG drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPG and XLE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

RSPGXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.98%

-71.26%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.05%

-18.79%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.44%

-26.04%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

-66.81%

-6.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-2.08%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.63%

-18.05%

-7.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

7.14%

+0.40%

Volatility

RSPG vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

RSPGXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

5.05%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.93%

13.94%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.50%

24.93%

+2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.52%

26.06%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.57%

29.48%

+4.09%