PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XNTK vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XNTK vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 24.79% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 14.62% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 24.07%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.26% annualized return.


XNTK

1D
-2.80%
1M
-6.90%
6M
21.81%
YTD
24.79%
1Y
45.38%
3Y*
33.60%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
24.07%

LVHD

1D
2.24%
1M
3.49%
6M
10.72%
YTD
14.62%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
10.97%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
8.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
24.79%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
14.62%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and LVHD is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015

0.31

The correlation between XNTK and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XNTK vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XNTK
LVHD

Technology

83.3%
3.1%

Communication Services

8.6%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
7.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

21.8%

Energy

-

7.4%

Financial Services

-

8.2%

Healthcare

-

4.4%

Industrials

-

4.9%

Real Estate

-

15.4%

Utilities

-

24.8%

Technology

XNTK
83.3%
LVHD
3.1%

Communication Services

XNTK
8.6%
LVHD
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XNTK
8.0%
LVHD
7.4%

Basic Materials

XNTK

-

LVHD

-

Consumer Defensive

XNTK

-

LVHD
21.8%

Energy

XNTK

-

LVHD
7.4%

Financial Services

XNTK

-

LVHD
8.2%

Healthcare

XNTK

-

LVHD
4.4%

Industrials

XNTK

-

LVHD
4.9%

Real Estate

XNTK

-

LVHD
15.4%

Utilities

XNTK

-

LVHD
24.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XNTK vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XNTKLVHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.71

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.31

6.72

+1.59

XNTK vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and LVHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and LVHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XNTKLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-37.32%

-35.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-6.17%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-14.29%

-13.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-16.75%

-31.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-37.32%

-10.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.31%

0.00%

-11.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

-4.02%

-17.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

2.49%

+2.99%

Volatility

XNTK vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) at 4.92%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XNTKLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.54%

4.92%

+7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.01%

8.10%

+15.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.23%

10.44%

+17.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.81%

13.02%

+15.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.05%

15.56%

+11.49%

XNTK vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

XNTK vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than LVHD's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.17%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%
XNTK
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
0.15%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XNTK and LVHD have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XNTK has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to LVHD (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs LVHD's -37.32%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 24.07% vs 8.26% for LVHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 24.07% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.15% for XNTK.

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while LVHD is Dividend. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.27% for LVHD.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and LVHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer