XNTK vs. VGT
XNTK (State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XNTK tracks the NYSE Technology Index while VGT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XNTK returned 26.37%/yr vs 25.96%/yr for VGT. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
XNTK vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 40.32% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 28.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XNTK having a 26.37% annualized return and VGT not far behind at 25.96%.
XNTK
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 11.78%
- YTD
- 40.32%
- 6M
- 38.74%
- 1Y
- 74.30%
- 3Y*
- 42.12%
- 5Y*
- 20.78%
- 10Y*
- 26.37%
VGT
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 28.03%
- 6M
- 26.85%
- 1Y
- 54.06%
- 3Y*
- 31.77%
- 5Y*
- 20.58%
- 10Y*
- 25.96%
XNTK vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 40.32% | 38.06% | 23.49% | 70.13% | -41.07% | 17.63% | 73.91% | 38.08% | -7.13% | 40.37% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 28.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNTK and VGT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.92 |
The correlation between XNTK and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
XNTK vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XNTK
VGT
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XNTK
VGT
Communication Services
XNTK
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
XNTK
VGT
Basic Materials
XNTK
-
VGT
Consumer Defensive
XNTK
-
VGT
-
Energy
XNTK
-
VGT
Financial Services
XNTK
-
VGT
Healthcare
XNTK
-
VGT
Industrials
XNTK
-
VGT
Real Estate
XNTK
-
VGT
-
Utilities
XNTK
-
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNTK vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
XNTK
VGT
XNTK vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XNTK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.40 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.39 | 3.31 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.28 | 10.16 | +4.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XNTK vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNTK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.38% | -54.63% | -17.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.00% | -16.40% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.11% | -27.23% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | -35.07% | -13.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | -35.07% | -13.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.18% | +4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -7.95% | -13.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | 5.34% | -0.12% |
Volatility
XNTK vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 13.49% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 10.66%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNTK | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.49% | 10.66% | +2.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.36% | 18.19% | +3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.16% | 22.44% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.41% | 25.50% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.91% | 24.78% | +2.13% |
XNTK vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNTK vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than VGT's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
XNTK State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, XNTK and VGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XNTK has higher volatility (13.49%) compared to VGT (10.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 26.37% vs 25.96% for VGT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 10.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 26.37% return vs 25.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.21% for XNTK.
XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.09% for VGT.
XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XNTK and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer