XMVE.DE vs. XB4A.DE
XMVE.DE (Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds from Xtrackers - XMVE.DE tracks the MSCI EMU Select ESG Screened while XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMVE.DE returned 9.87%/yr vs 17.80%/yr for XB4A.DE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMVE.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XB4A.DE.
Performance
XMVE.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMVE.DE achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 22.80% return.
XMVE.DE
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 18.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 1Y
- 45.21%
- 3Y*
- 30.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
XMVE.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMVE.DE Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 10.01% | 21.50% | 8.85% | 19.87% | -12.89% | 16.87% | -3.71% | 17.86% | -6.36% | 13.58% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.80% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 32.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMVE.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2016 | 0.67 |
The correlation between XMVE.DE and XB4A.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMVE.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XMVE.DE
XB4A.DE
XMVE.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMVE.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.43 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 4.13 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 13.97 | -7.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMVE.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMVE.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, smaller than the maximum XB4A.DE drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVE.DE and XB4A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMVE.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.33% | -53.54% | +20.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.11% | -10.88% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -16.26% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.28% | -32.50% | +7.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -3.43% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -9.88% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 3.23% | -0.48% |
Volatility
XMVE.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) is 3.86%, while Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that XMVE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMVE.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 4.97% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 14.95% | -2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 17.66% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 19.15% | -2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.46% | 20.15% | -4.69% |
XMVE.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMVE.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMVE.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison
XMVE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, while XB4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMVE.DE Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 2.45% | 2.62% | 2.92% | 2.64% | 4.73% | 1.87% | 6.84% | 0.00% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMVE.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMVE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
XMVE.DE tracks MSCI EMU Select ESG Screened, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMVE.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
Find the right allocation for XMVE.DE and XB4A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer