XMVE.DE vs. XNAS.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

XMVE.DE (Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XMVE.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU Select ESG Screened, while XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMVE.DE returned 9.87%/yr vs 15.95%/yr for XNAS.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMVE.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.DE.

Performance

XMVE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVE.DE achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 17.93% return.

XMVE.DE

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -2.04%
• 6M: 6.70%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 1Y: 18.74%
• 3Y*: 14.73%
• 5Y*: 9.87%
• 10Y*: —

XNAS.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: 16.10%
• YTD: 17.93%
• 1Y: 28.93%
• 3Y*: 22.87%
• 5Y*: 15.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMVE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XMVE.DE Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF	10.01%	21.50%	8.85%	19.87%	-12.89%	17.05%
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	17.93%	7.11%	33.75%	51.36%	-29.99%	31.23%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVE.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021	0.60

The correlation between XMVE.DE and XNAS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XMVE.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMVE.DE

XMVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 49
XMVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
XMVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XMVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
XMVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XMVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 53

XNAS.DE

XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 65
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMVE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMVE.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.71	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	2.35	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	2.91	-1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	8.31	-1.52

XMVE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVE.DE and XNAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMVE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVE.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVE.DE and XNAS.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMVE.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.33%	-31.25%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.11%	-10.00%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.52%	-26.72%	+11.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.28%	-31.25%	+5.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.68%	-3.52%	+0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-7.71%	+2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	3.49%	-0.74%

Volatility

XMVE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) is 3.86%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that XMVE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMVE.DE	XNAS.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	5.65%	-1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.41%	12.50%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.80%	17.15%	-2.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	20.10%	-3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.46%	19.92%	-4.46%

XMVE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMVE.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XMVE.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

XMVE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, while XNAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XMVE.DE Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF	2.45%	2.62%	2.92%	2.64%	4.73%	1.87%	6.84%	0.00%	0.68%
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMVE.DE and XNAS.DE in my portfolio?

XMVE.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMVE.DE or XNAS.DE?

On fees, XMVE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMVE.DE or XNAS.DE?

XMVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

What is the main difference between XMVE.DE and XNAS.DE?

XMVE.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. XMVE.DE tracks MSCI EMU Select ESG Screened, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMVE.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.