XB4A.DE vs. DBXS.DE
XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) and DBXS.DE (Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Europe Equities funds from Xtrackers - XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index while DBXS.DE tracks the Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XB4A.DE returned 14.71%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for DBXS.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XB4A.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DBXS.DE.
Performance
XB4A.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XB4A.DE achieves a 24.81% return, which is significantly higher than DBXS.DE's 10.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XB4A.DE has outperformed DBXS.DE with an annualized return of 14.71%, while DBXS.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.42% annualized return.
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 22.10%
- YTD
- 24.81%
- 1Y
- 48.60%
- 3Y*
- 31.52%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
DBXS.DE
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- 23.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
XB4A.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 24.81% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 32.88% |
DBXS.DE Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) | 10.09% | 19.12% | 3.77% | 10.63% | -11.87% | 28.73% | 1.61% | 35.45% | -4.24% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XB4A.DE and DBXS.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2011 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XB4A.DE vs. DBXS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XB4A.DE
DBXS.DE
XB4A.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) and Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XB4A.DE | DBXS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.30 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.44 | 1.92 | +2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.07 | 6.62 | +8.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XB4A.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XB4A.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, which is greater than DBXS.DE's maximum drawdown of -48.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB4A.DE and DBXS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XB4A.DE | DBXS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.54% | -48.29% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -12.05% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -14.48% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.50% | -17.19% | -15.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.54% | -25.14% | -28.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -1.45% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.88% | -8.73% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 3.51% | -0.29% |
Volatility
XB4A.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) (DBXS.DE) at 3.64%. This indicates that XB4A.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XB4A.DE | DBXS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 3.64% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.88% | 10.89% | +3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.61% | 13.78% | +3.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 13.40% | +5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 13.99% | +6.16% |
XB4A.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XB4A.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DBXS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XB4A.DE vs. DBXS.DE - Dividend Comparison
XB4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBXS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXS.DE Xtrackers Switzerland UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.38% | 1.52% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 3.25% | 1.20% | 1.59% | 1.21% | 2.35% | 1.32% | 1.06% | 1.25% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XB4A.DE and DBXS.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XB4A.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XB4A.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXS.DE.
XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index, while DBXS.DE tracks Solactive Swiss Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XB4A.DE and 0.30% for DBXS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XB4A.DE and DBXS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer