PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMVE.DE vs. PR1E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMVE.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) and Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVE.DE achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than PR1E.DE's 10.89% return.


XMVE.DE

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.04%
6M
6.70%
YTD
10.01%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*

PR1E.DE

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.49%
6M
6.80%
YTD
10.89%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMVE.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XMVE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF
10.01%21.50%8.85%19.87%-12.89%16.87%-3.71%12.11%
PR1E.DE
Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D)
10.89%20.51%8.42%15.89%-9.36%25.41%-3.59%20.36%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVE.DE and PR1E.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019

0.92

The correlation between XMVE.DE and PR1E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMVE.DE vs. PR1E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMVE.DE
XMVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XMVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1E.DE
PR1E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PR1E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMVE.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) and Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMVE.DEPR1E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.27

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.79

8.76

-1.97

XMVE.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the PR1E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVE.DE and PR1E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMVE.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVE.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, smaller than the maximum PR1E.DE drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVE.DE and PR1E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMVE.DEPR1E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.33%

-35.99%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.11%

-9.39%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-16.84%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.28%

-19.65%

-5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-1.84%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-4.76%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

2.44%

+0.31%

Volatility

XMVE.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XMVE.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1E.DE) at 3.20%. This indicates that XMVE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMVE.DEPR1E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

3.20%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

10.96%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.80%

13.04%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

14.47%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

16.51%

-1.05%

XMVE.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMVE.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1E.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XMVE.DE vs. PR1E.DE - Dividend Comparison

XMVE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than PR1E.DE's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PR1E.DE
Amundi Prime Europe UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.31%2.56%2.87%2.91%3.15%2.25%2.17%2.73%0.00%
XMVE.DE
Xtrackers MSCI EMU ESG Screened UCITS ETF
2.45%2.62%2.92%2.64%4.73%1.87%6.84%0.00%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, XMVE.DE and PR1E.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PR1E.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1E.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XMVE.DE.

XMVE.DE tracks MSCI EMU Select ESG Screened, while PR1E.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Europe Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XMVE.DE and 0.05% for PR1E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMVE.DE and PR1E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer