PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XB4A.DE vs. EXXX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XB4A.DE vs. EXXX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) and iShares ATX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XB4A.DE having a 26.47% return and EXXX.DE slightly lower at 26.40%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XB4A.DE having a 15.98% annualized return and EXXX.DE not far behind at 15.61%.


XB4A.DE

1D
1.02%
1M
8.17%
6M
25.41%
YTD
26.47%
1Y
51.75%
3Y*
31.70%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
15.98%

EXXX.DE

1D
0.98%
1M
8.32%
6M
25.26%
YTD
26.40%
1Y
51.78%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
17.65%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XB4A.DE vs. EXXX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XB4A.DE
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)
26.47%51.29%11.01%14.27%-16.45%42.39%-10.86%19.79%-17.99%32.88%
EXXX.DE
iShares ATX UCITS ETF (DE)
26.40%51.31%10.39%13.71%-16.43%42.16%-11.27%19.95%-18.96%32.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XB4A.DE and EXXX.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2011

0.94

The correlation between XB4A.DE and EXXX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)

iShares ATX UCITS ETF (DE)

Return for Risk

XB4A.DE vs. EXXX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XB4A.DE
XB4A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XB4A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB4A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

EXXX.DE
EXXX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EXXX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXXX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXXX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EXXX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXXX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XB4A.DE vs. EXXX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) and iShares ATX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XB4A.DEEXXX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.50

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.73

4.81

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.12

16.27

-0.15

XB4A.DE vs. EXXX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XB4A.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the EXXX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XB4A.DE and EXXX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XB4A.DE vs. EXXX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XB4A.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, smaller than the maximum EXXX.DE drawdown of -71.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XB4A.DE and EXXX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XB4A.DEEXXX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.54%

-71.43%

+17.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-10.71%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-16.11%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.50%

-32.69%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.54%

-52.90%

-0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.44%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-28.46%

+18.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.17%

+0.03%

Volatility

XB4A.DE vs. EXXX.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) and iShares ATX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXXX.DE) have volatilities of 6.08% and 5.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XB4A.DEEXXX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

5.95%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

14.44%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.53%

17.43%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.15%

19.15%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.21%

20.00%

+0.21%

XB4A.DE vs. EXXX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XB4A.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EXXX.DE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

XB4A.DE vs. EXXX.DE - Dividend Comparison

XB4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EXXX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXXX.DE
iShares ATX UCITS ETF (DE)
2.92%2.53%4.30%3.53%3.61%1.04%1.18%1.73%0.48%0.65%1.08%1.65%
XB4A.DE
Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, XB4A.DE and EXXX.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XB4A.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XB4A.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EXXX.DE.

Both ETFs track ATX Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XB4A.DE and 0.32% for EXXX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XB4A.DE and EXXX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer